General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

London gets bombed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2005, 11:23 PM
  #51  
3.0 BAR
 
dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,155
Default Re: London gets bombed

Originally Posted by MakAttack
i think what BD meant was something along the lines of....take for example, kennedy's assasination....the president was lost, and all hell did not break loose. we have people under people under people for a reason. so that if something unfortunate did happen, like the pres passing away, we have people who know what's going on, and know what to do with the country to take over.

call me ignorant too if ya want, but i mean, we have a VP and the senate and all those other people for a reason. *shrug*
thank you mary. you said that much better than i did

and RS tell me what i was ignorant about and back it up. You told me once that you and I shouldn't argue because we should make an example of being vet here in HMT. I tried that with you figuring that we can discuss things and not agree about it without resorting to our ---- talking. But like always I can't make an intelligent conversation with you without your insult. If anything you think in one way and dont want to here any other opinion about anything. I dont hate you I have nothing against you at all but you can be so god damn difficult sometimes.
dragon is offline  
Old 07-07-2005, 11:29 PM
  #52  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: London gets bombed

Originally Posted by BlackDragon
Originally Posted by MakAttack
i think what BD meant was something along the lines of....take for example, kennedy's assasination....the president was lost, and all hell did not break loose. we have people under people under people for a reason. so that if something unfortunate did happen, like the pres passing away, we have people who know what's going on, and know what to do with the country to take over.

call me ignorant too if ya want, but i mean, we have a VP and the senate and all those other people for a reason. *shrug*
thank you mary. you said that much better than i did

and RS tell me what i was ignorant about and back it up. You told me once that you and I shouldn't argue because we should make an example of being vet here in HMT. I tried that with you figuring that we can discuss things and not agree about it without resorting to our ---- talking. But like always I can't make an intelligent conversation with you without your insult. If anything you think in one way and dont want to here any other opinion about anything. I dont hate you I have nothing against you at all but you can be so god damn difficult sometimes.
:/

you are ignorant saying the president is a ----- because he isnt on the frontlines leading the charge. that is totally unrealistic in this day and age.

J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 07-07-2005, 11:31 PM
  #53  
0.0 BAR
 
MikeJ-2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: London gets bombed

The fact is, it's the governments job to make people feel secure in thier day to day lives. Putting the President in any position to be killed doesn't go along those lines.
When Kennedy was shot, most of us weren't alive (including the people here that seem to know that all hell didn't break loose ) Anytime something like that happens, or 9/11, or anything out of the ordinary, even if all hell doesn't break loose, the country still will have an unstable feeling. It's in everyones best interest for that feeling not to be present.




RS- call me clinton again and I'm shooting up your house.
MikeJ-2009 is offline  
Old 07-07-2005, 11:37 PM
  #54  
3.0 BAR
 
dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,155
Default Re: London gets bombed

Originally Posted by random-strike
Originally Posted by BlackDragon
Originally Posted by MakAttack
i think what BD meant was something along the lines of....take for example, kennedy's assasination....the president was lost, and all hell did not break loose. we have people under people under people for a reason. so that if something unfortunate did happen, like the pres passing away, we have people who know what's going on, and know what to do with the country to take over.

call me ignorant too if ya want, but i mean, we have a VP and the senate and all those other people for a reason. *shrug*
thank you mary. you said that much better than i did

and RS tell me what i was ignorant about and back it up. You told me once that you and I shouldn't argue because we should make an example of being vet here in HMT. I tried that with you figuring that we can discuss things and not agree about it without resorting to our ---- talking. But like always I can't make an intelligent conversation with you without your insult. If anything you think in one way and dont want to here any other opinion about anything. I dont hate you I have nothing against you at all but you can be so god damn difficult sometimes.
:/

you are ignorant saying the president is a ----- because he isnt on the frontlines leading the charge. that is totally unrealistic in this day and age.

why because you say so? And they way i feel is not called ignorant. ignorant means lacking knowledge or skills. Meaning no education or unaware. What i have is a point of view and opinion. Your a one minded idiot. What you think is only what you believe and what other feel or think means nothing and is irrelavant. I'm aware how things is now but i feel they view Bush has is not right. And i simply said if he wants to send people to die he should go his damn self. Get off his nutts already
dragon is offline  
Old 07-07-2005, 11:48 PM
  #55  
0.0 BAR
 
MikeJ-2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: London gets bombed

Jesus, the President doesn't go to the battle to fight. It's been that way for a long time, it's going to be that way forever, and I think I've stated the obvious as to why it is that way. Quit basing your argument on the damn President going to fight in the war. It's not something that is going to happen.


It'd be like me saying life would be better if we were allowed to have 3 wives each. I can sit here and tell people they are wrong for only having one, and how much better 3 would be, and how much I think that would be better, but the fact is it's just not going to happen, so everytime I said anything about having 3 wives I SOUND LIKE A MORON.

(you have to relate all subjects to women with BD) lol
MikeJ-2009 is offline  
Old 07-07-2005, 11:50 PM
  #56  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: London gets bombed

Originally Posted by BlackDragon
Originally Posted by random-strike
Originally Posted by BlackDragon
Originally Posted by MakAttack
i think what BD meant was something along the lines of....take for example, kennedy's assasination....the president was lost, and all hell did not break loose. we have people under people under people for a reason. so that if something unfortunate did happen, like the pres passing away, we have people who know what's going on, and know what to do with the country to take over.

call me ignorant too if ya want, but i mean, we have a VP and the senate and all those other people for a reason. *shrug*
thank you mary. you said that much better than i did

and RS tell me what i was ignorant about and back it up. You told me once that you and I shouldn't argue because we should make an example of being vet here in HMT. I tried that with you figuring that we can discuss things and not agree about it without resorting to our ---- talking. But like always I can't make an intelligent conversation with you without your insult. If anything you think in one way and dont want to here any other opinion about anything. I dont hate you I have nothing against you at all but you can be so god damn difficult sometimes.
:/

you are ignorant saying the president is a ----- because he isnt on the frontlines leading the charge. that is totally unrealistic in this day and age.

why because you say so? And they way i feel is not called ignorant. ignorant means lacking knowledge or skills. Meaning no education or unaware. What i have is a point of view and opinion. Your a one minded idiot. What you think is only what you believe and what other feel or think means nothing and is irrelavant. I'm aware how things is now but i feel they view Bush has is not right. And i simply said if he wants to send people to die he should go his damn self. Get off his nutts already
its the president's job to do that, and make decisions.

was the demorat that started the vietnam war a ----- coward too?

what about bush 41. is he a coward? what about ronald reagan is he a coward for talking tough to russia, is he a coward for bombing libya?

is clinton a coward for attacking syria, iraq, kosovo, somalia?
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 07-07-2005, 11:53 PM
  #57  
0.0 BAR
 
MikeJ-2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: London gets bombed

Yes, they are all cowards.


I can't wait till I'm President. The kim jo lung bitch is going down. I'm walking right up to his front door to find out what's up. I'm not even taking a gun. I'm going with my mad Nintendo kung-fu skills.


BD will make all kinds of HMT threads about how great of a leader I was.
MikeJ-2009 is offline  
Old 07-07-2005, 11:55 PM
  #58  
3.0 BAR
 
dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,155
Default Re: London gets bombed

Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Jesus, the President doesn't go to the battle to fight. It's been that way for a long time, it's going to be that way forever, and I think I've stated the obvious as to why it is that way. Quit basing your argument on the damn President going to fight in the war. It's not something that is going to happen.


It'd be like me saying life would be better if we were allowed to have 3 wives each. I can sit here and tell people they are wrong for only having one, and how much better 3 would be, and how much I think that would be better, but the fact is it's just not going to happen, so everytime I said anything about having 3 wives I SOUND LIKE A MORON.

(you have to relate all subjects to women with BD) lol
haha i can have a conversation with my man Steve because he doesn't take ---- seriously. I know Bush wont fight in the war and things change now but i simply stated history that leader did fight with there troops. yes they dont do it now but they did. And it much easier to send people to die then to go along with them. You've heard the saying "I would never have you do anything that I wouldn't do myself" well i dont think Bush is that way.

Bush is a ----- because i know he doesn't have the ballz to go to war as i would if i were president fighting for something i believe in. And im not afraid to die. If i fall I know simply someone else would take my place as a leader.
dragon is offline  
Old 07-07-2005, 11:57 PM
  #59  
3.0 BAR
 
dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,155
Default Re: London gets bombed

Originally Posted by Stealthmode
BD will make all kinds of HMT threads about how great of a leader I was.
You damn right i would Steve. Cuz i know unlike Bush you've got *****
dragon is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 12:04 AM
  #60  
0.0 BAR
 
MikeJ-2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: London gets bombed

Well, you can have an opinion about him for whatever reason, but you can't think he's a ----- because he isn't in Iraq right now. We've already established that would never happen, so he can't be a ----- for that.


It's obvious that you don't like him for more reasons than "he's not in Iraq" right now. And when you're President, they won't let you go to the war either. Sorry to break your heart.
MikeJ-2009 is offline  


Quick Reply: London gets bombed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM.