Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

twin charger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 08:47 PM
  #1  
txdohczc's Avatar
Thread Starter
3.0 BAR
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,595
From: texas
Default twin charger

i want to do a twin charger setp on my car. i want to make alot of boost and dont want any lag. so i have the supercharger for instant boost then a huge turbo top end boost so i get a 6psi s/c then take that 6psi and compress it in a turbo to compress it another 6psi will i have 12psi final or 36psi final. what do you all think
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 12:16 PM
  #2  
AaronZ34's Avatar
0.5 BAR
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 166
Default

Brilliant. Pics?
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 11:02 PM
  #3  
HONDAaSIf's Avatar
0.5 BAR
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 52
Default

gonna be hard
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 11:28 PM
  #4  
reddevil's Avatar
1.0 BAR
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 397
Default

Easy. Been there, done that.

Turbo feeds Supercharger....

https://www.homemadeturbo.com/forum/...make-22-a.html

https://www.homemadeturbo.com/forum/...ally-work.html
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 11:43 PM
  #5  
biomatrix's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Default

but to anwser your question of boost, it depends on each compressors efficency, and just with some guessamation math, running a turbo (first stage) at 6psi would give you a 1.4:1 ratio, and the 2nd stage which would then would prob be compressing at the same ratio (assuming it's set for 6psi on it's own) of 1.4:1 then you would have 2.8:1 of boost.
assuming your at 14.7 static, you would then be at 41.16 static PSI. resulting in ~26.4 PSI of boost.
that's about as simple as it goes...
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 04:45 PM
  #6  
sparklingwiggle's Avatar
0.5 BAR
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Default

overkill?
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 08:41 AM
  #7  
hatchdx-si's Avatar
0.5 BAR
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 48
Default

eleventy billion PSIs wow maxor poweerz, would it be faster than a simple single turbo setup...?
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #8  
kjell's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Default

well heres the problem...outside of it being horrendously expensive....the boost supplied from the turbo will just run into the back of the blades of the supercharger thus lowering the boost output from the turbo (not to mention possibly damaging the supercharger fins).....i had this idea a while back....looked into it pretty extensively.....not a good choice haha
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #9  
reddevil's Avatar
1.0 BAR
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 397
Default

Originally Posted by kjell
well heres the problem...outside of it being horrendously expensive....the boost supplied from the turbo will just run into the back of the blades of the supercharger thus lowering the boost output from the turbo (not to mention possibly damaging the supercharger fins).....i had this idea a while back....looked into it pretty extensively.....not a good choice haha
NOT.
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 04:24 PM
  #10  
kjell's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Default

Originally Posted by reddevil
NOT.
its not like im saying that your going to see less boost with both than you would with one because you will see more
im sorry if i made that a bit hard to follow
but what im saying is that you would be more efficient/better off to run two turbos of different sizes with a crossover to equalize the back pressure than you would to run this system. try it if you want and nothing is holding you back but i have looked into it... i work with engineers...im going to school for engineering and they agree that this is less efficient

let the flame begin



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 AM.