rsmith2786

So we got a new kid at work that will be taking over my position at the end of the summer. He has been talking a lot of ---- lately about Honda’s and how his DSM is soooo much better and more advanced. I pretty much no nothing about DSM's other than stealing the turbo parts off of it to use on a Honda.

Can anyone give me some good data or info to help me shut this kid up. He keeps telling me about how all the Honda owners are stupid and run the wrong parts such as incorrectly sized turbine housings, how his valvetrain setup is so much more advanced, and on and on.

I was hoping for some arguments of cylinder head flow or anything that can really be compared. I know this sounds pretty childish but i am sick of listening to his ramblings.

USS

His car is a rolling fire hazard.... when it does move.

klyph

Sorry, but DSM's are pretty much God's gift to the automotive world. The design was decyphered from a code hidden in the dead sea scrolls. You'll never find a vehicle with as high a level of quality construction. They are both an engineering marvel and a work of art. Not one single owner has ever had a problem with one, nor ever had to do any maintenance whatsoever.
DSM>*
/thread

turbohf

and this is why every DSM guy is an -------... cuz this its true to all DSM owners....

Jorsher

ehhh honda/domestic/vw/etc owners can all be the same way.

I've never owned a dsm so can't comment, but I drove one for a couple months and it consumed oil like nothing else.

MAJORAHOLE

CRANKWALK

BirdmanMD

Perfek360

every kid that i've met that owns a boosted dsm has had the trouble of keeping the car from wraping around a light pole...lolz

zlyricist

ive owned nothing but mazdas in my day. most of the parts on the car that have failed were mitsubishi parts (starter, disty, etc)