typert

I went to baseline my new engine before I install the 3rd turbo kit. don't ask! Anyway, I saw a New V6 mustang. I had a 1968 mustang and the interior is very similar! it was slower than my stock neon but managed a 16.01 and it was an auto.





Just for good measure -this guy was in the staging lane ahead of me - !

AgentMurdoc

I saw the new mustang at the local dealership a week or so ago, but I was too lazy to take pics :P

so where are the results of your run

typert

It was just rebuilt with forged intrnals - 1 point lower than stock compression. Exhaust ports on the head were enlarged to flow 230cfm, UDP, and a header, crane turbo grind cams. I was a little surpised. cams must have helped a little! this was with a one legged burnout.. I even had smoke roll up to my window :P how about that R/T woot!

R/T .523
60' 2.343
330 6.614
1/8 ET 10.153
1/8 MPH 69.01
1/4 ET 15.793
1/4 MPH 87.55

SkunT

my wife is hooked on one of those dam things.
we went and talked to a salesman about a white GT stang, but thats about as far as we got with it. :P

she wants on.

Reddy

From the concept pictures I've seen of it I thought that Mustang looked badass but seeing it now its ugly as ----! Did they go out of their way to make the interior look that cheap?

88crxSi

i completely agree. it looks like crap from the doors back. almost a "too much metal" look.. need more window.

bad call ford!

Ravage70

Thats one ugly car

NCHorseplay

That is an auto V6. they should still run mid to low 15's. a 5speed version should run high 14's, maybe. The Gt has already run mid 13's with the auto should run low 13's with the 5speed on the stock street tires. Should see 12's with not much more than sticky tires.

Honda16hb

the pictures I saw of the new mustang looked better than that ----, that car looks like what I think a pile of *** would look like, we're talking about unattractive ***. I'd rather have an element.