General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

WAR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2003, 02:35 PM
  #11  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:WAR

see you got the bleeding heart liberal "cdtrix" all bent out of shape lol. how many american soldiers died in iraq in the first war? i think only 1 is MIA or KIA. he was a fighter pilot who got shot down by a SAM. and they haven't found him. all the other causualities were from friendly fire. which always happends.

i think "cdtrix" forgot about the humilitating defeat saddam took in the first gulf war. and then all the peaceniks where saying it was for oil. but did the US conquer and control all the oil fields in Iraq? NO. could we have? YES.

most if not all the peaceniks are anti-american anti-conservitive anti-bush homos. they don't care about anything else. they live in their socialist dream world where everything turns out peachy. then sometimes real men have to fight and die for them to live in that dream world.


J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 02:52 PM
  #12  
0.5 BAR
 
CdTriX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 127
Default Re:WAR

CASUALTY FIGURES:

Iraq: Original figures listed 100,000 Iraqi military dead, but more recent estimates place Iraqi dead at 20,000 military and 2,300 civilian.


United States: 148 killed in action, 458 wounded. Also, 121 Americans died through non-combat incidents.

random-strike, do you think going to war is the right thing to do? and do you think that USA has enough resources to rebuild iraq?
CdTriX is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 03:20 PM
  #13  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:WAR

yeah i think its the right thing to do. we will not have to pay for rebuiding iraq, without saddam, the money the country makes from the oil they sell will not go to saddam's swiss bank accounts and to building huge statues of himself and all his presidental palaces and building chemical weapons and trying to build a nuclear weapon. it will be used to better iraq, like it should have been all along.

when the united states marine corps rolls into bahgdad, the iraq people will be dancing in the streets, just like the kuwaities where during the first gulf war, and much like the french, germans, and italians were during WWII.

i'm not sure if those figures you put out are right, most of the soldiers who were KIA, died from friendly fire. 38 died in a scud missile attack on a base in kuwait, and the rest died in accidents, which always happends.

those civialian figures seem large, the people who did that are probably counting the "children that starved" because no one had food to feed them.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001293.html

J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 03:54 PM
  #14  
3.0 BAR
 
RENR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,401
Default Re:WAR

Originally Posted by CdTriX
*sigh* here we go again

USA did not liberate FRANCE from the axis powers....
do your research ( note: not american published ) and maybe pay attention in a history class or 2.. really...

the thing is.. BUSH is a religious war mongering greedy bastard... he's a born again christian, hating on saddam cause he tried to kill his dad, AND wants iraq for oil..

You know WHY BUSH wants IRAQ? like all strong powers.. they rely on resources, once all the oil in the states have been extracted ( give or take 8-10 years ) the US will have nothing left... in order to KEEP the POWER and the military and the money, The americans MUST get IRAQ b4 the chinese or the russians get to it... it is a BIG strategic move.. IF the americans DO get Iraq then the USA would maintain it's WORLD POWERS... therefore justifying meddling into other peoples business like always

SADDAM HAS NO RELATIONSHIP WITH AL`QUEDA or OSAMA BIN LADEN!!!!!!!! SADDAM kills his people... doesn't matter what religion or whatever they are HE WILL KILL THEM... WHICH is opposite of what BIN lADEN is trying to do...

BIN LADEN is trying to unite the islamic people into fighting against the western civilizations... HE does not like saddam because saddam kills the islams...

what i fear the most is the lost of lives... everyone wants war.. everyone is a patriot... everyone is a bandwagon jumper... once the first soldier is killed... what now... a soldier died for WHO'S freedom? NOT the AMERICANS, NOT THE IRAQ PEOPLE, but for what? OIL? Everyone thinks it's gonna be a 2 hour war where all the bad guys die and the good guys provail... WRONG women and children will die during the bombing, American soldiers will die, Parents will grieve and then you realize... WAR is WRONG....

anyone that is PRO WAR are not a soldier, you do not have to put yourselves on the line for the supposed "FREEDOM" of your country, you are not overseas, you are not holding a rifle, you are not there... THINK about those that ARE going to war for YOUR country... thousands of men marching along the desert fighting for their country, as easily as a warm knife is cut through butter... a life can easily be taken.. please think b4 you want a war... because your not there doesn't mean you shouldn't care about those that are
why the hell are u defending a dumbass like sddam. he should die and you too for defending him. i have served in the military and i would be more that proud to die defending freeedom and my country. its idiots like you that get punked and allow terrorism to rule your lives.without the proud soldiers defending freedom dumbasses like you wouldnt be able to put together homemade turbo kits, so ---- osama and sadam!!!
RENR is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 04:29 PM
  #15  
0.0 BAR
 
beerbongskickass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:WAR

I think Metallica said is best...

KILL 'EM ALL.

beerbongskickass is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 04:33 PM
  #16  
0.0 BAR
 
4cylTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 23
Default Re:WAR

We would not start a huge war just because of oil cdtrix. We have the capable technology to run cars on battery, solar, and now merging hydrogen powered cars. The war is more than about oil or "revenge."
4cylTurbo is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 04:43 PM
  #17  
Administrator
 
HMT-Admin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,991
Default Re:WAR

Why not just do a "flat rate" style war? get a few undercover guys (secret service/snipers/whatever) kill the ****** and all his advisors, and call it a ------- day?

All this war ---- is just dumb, all the money, all the time and peoples lives that that it will change, just because of this piece of ---- running the country. I understand something has to be done, but you would think we could be a bit smarter about it.

Jeff
HMT-Admin is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 04:59 PM
  #18  
3.0 BAR
 
RENR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,401
Default Re:WAR

i agree, that would be faster and cheaper and save lives all at the same time. :P
RENR is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 06:40 PM
  #19  
1.5 BAR
 
fiero_god's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 784
Default Re:WAR

I would have to agree with jeff ,---- the media and everyone else. Bush is a ----- of the rich hes tainted and bought. Just send in some guys take his *** out and get it over with. As for france they are pussies just like in WW II when they just let hitler just "walk in" and they greeted him ..............sick.
fiero_god is offline  
Old 03-19-2003, 09:32 PM
  #20  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:WAR

the US has tried for years to assasinate saddam, read a book or watch s show on the discovery channel for christs sake. he has like 10 different look-a-likes. and never sleeps in the same building two days in a row. he has 6 different caravans of cars when he travels. its not that easy.
J-SMITH69 is offline  


Quick Reply: WAR



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 AM.