General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2004, 11:36 PM
  #31  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)

Originally Posted by AbaZ
Your car also had stock suspension, lol...

I've been in a s2k around 145mph on a track and it felt pretty stable to me. Those cars may not be fast johnny, but a itr, ctr, s2000 can all smoke your 5.0l fox body mustang in stock form.

smoke is hardly the word i would use, compare them to 88 itrs/ctrs/s2ks oh there wasnt any compare them to the hondas of the time period :/

compare those cars to GTs of the same year, stang wins for cheaper

completly stock 5.0l foxbody + 4.10 rear end gears = 13.5 1/4

faster than all those for the 110 it costs for gears
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 11-24-2004, 04:05 AM
  #32  
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
 
L_S_i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 185
Default Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)

The roads are not so good over here, except highways, so the first thing the kids do when they buy a car is spend 1500 € (+-1900 dollars) in a suspension and rims and tires.
Yeah this cars are very very stable.
L_S_i is offline  
Old 11-24-2004, 12:05 PM
  #33  
3.0 BAR
 
nonvtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,950
Default Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)

Originally Posted by random-strike
Originally Posted by AbaZ
Your car also had stock suspension, lol...

I've been in a s2k around 145mph on a track and it felt pretty stable to me. Those cars may not be fast johnny, but a itr, ctr, s2000 can all smoke your 5.0l fox body mustang in stock form.

smoke is hardly the word i would use, compare them to 88 itrs/ctrs/s2ks oh there wasnt any compare them to the hondas of the time period :/

compare those cars to GTs of the same year, stang wins for cheaper

completly stock 5.0l foxbody + 4.10 rear end gears = 13.5 1/4

faster than all those for the 110 it costs for gears
I know a lot of kids and have been to the track in the boonies where I live and have yet to see a fox body go 13.5 with just gears. they run like high 14's stock, you're not taking a second off with gears. All my friend's are muscle car guys too so if you respond to this you don't have to treat me like a Honda Rice kid
nonvtec is offline  
Old 11-24-2004, 06:33 PM
  #34  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)

Originally Posted by nonvtec
Originally Posted by random-strike
Originally Posted by AbaZ
Your car also had stock suspension, lol...

I've been in a s2k around 145mph on a track and it felt pretty stable to me. Those cars may not be fast johnny, but a itr, ctr, s2000 can all smoke your 5.0l fox body mustang in stock form.

smoke is hardly the word i would use, compare them to 88 itrs/ctrs/s2ks oh there wasnt any compare them to the hondas of the time period :/

compare those cars to GTs of the same year, stang wins for cheaper

completly stock 5.0l foxbody + 4.10 rear end gears = 13.5 1/4

faster than all those for the 110 it costs for gears
I know a lot of kids and have been to the track in the boonies where I live and have yet to see a fox body go 13.5 with just gears. they run like high 14's stock, you're not taking a second off with gears. All my friend's are muscle car guys too so if you respond to this you don't have to treat me like a Honda Rice kid
14.8 with 2.73 gears (stock)
ive seen 13.8 with 4.10 gears

believe me it makes a gigantic difference.
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 11-24-2004, 06:37 PM
  #35  
0.0 BAR
 
Reddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)

rear gears go real well with Mustangs there's no arguing that.
Reddy is offline  
Old 11-25-2004, 01:15 AM
  #36  
1.0 BAR
 
Cadracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 366
Default Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)

I liked the video crazy to go that fast for that long.But whats the use for the 4.10 gears if you can only drive from stop light to stop light.My 77 camoaro had the 4.10 gears an i was up against the msd 6k chip rev limiter at 125 so i put in the 7k chip cuz needed that 15mph to stay with jeff.LOL But sbc dont like 7k for long periods.I never held it there but the guy i sold the car did an well it grenanded. 2 valve stuck in the pistons, stem first an now the block has access to 2 cyls at once.LOL
Cadracer is offline  
Old 11-25-2004, 01:17 AM
  #37  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)

Originally Posted by Cadracer
I liked the video crazy to go that fast for that long.But whats the use for the 4.10 gears if you can only drive from stop light to stop light.My 77 camoaro had the 4.10 gears an i was up against the msd 6k chip rev limiter at 125 so i put in the 7k chip cuz needed that 15mph to stay with jeff.LOL But sbc does like 7k for long periods.I never held it there but the guy i sold the car did an well it grenanded. 2 valve stuck in the pistons stem first an now the block has access to 2 cyls at once.LOL
haha nice

my stang has a cobra rear end with 3.55 gears. they still feel really tall but i think they will be very nice when the engine is charged. but im partial to 3.73s
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 11-25-2004, 01:23 AM
  #38  
0.0 BAR
 
R-MAK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)

Originally Posted by Whitey
rear gears go real well with Mustangs there's no arguing that.
you got that right !
R-MAK is offline  
Old 11-25-2004, 12:24 PM
  #39  
3.0 BAR
 
Spenser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,930
Default Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)

4:10 posi baby!!
Spenser is offline  
Old 11-25-2004, 01:55 PM
  #40  
0.0 BAR
 
R-MAK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)

3.73's
R-MAK is offline  


Quick Reply: Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 AM.