turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
01-06-2007, 12:04 AM
#51
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Originally Posted by random-strike
if you change out to one it makes sense
the corollas are slow man... but compared to anything honda had in '85 the corolla gts was where it was at. good handling and with a lot of options... plus the interiors were great, for 85.
01-06-2007, 12:15 AM
#52
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Originally Posted by turbo4age
whats your setup? mustang right?
the corollas are slow man... but compared to anything honda had in '85 the corolla gts was where it was at. good handling and with a lot of options... plus the interiors were great, for 85.
the corollas are slow man... but compared to anything honda had in '85 the corolla gts was where it was at. good handling and with a lot of options... plus the interiors were great, for 85.
i know they are slow, they look fine (the GTS) when they are stock. when they are riced out they look terrible.
the gook "drift" styling looks stupid on them also... you know what i mean
01-06-2007, 01:02 PM
#53
1.0 BAR
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 539
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Originally Posted by N1ghtM0nkey
It's a shame that a good Toyota body to put those engines in is hard to come by, atleast where I live. What else can you put those motors in that is fairly inexpensive? Body wise that is... ( <5k )
I always wanted a Toyota
I always wanted a Toyota
Originally Posted by turbo4age
whats your setup? mustang right?
the corollas are slow man... but compared to anything honda had in '85 the corolla gts was where it was at. good handling and with a lot of options... plus the interiors were great, for 85.
the corollas are slow man... but compared to anything honda had in '85 the corolla gts was where it was at. good handling and with a lot of options... plus the interiors were great, for 85.
01-06-2007, 01:09 PM
#54
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Eh, I missed reading that. No, sorry, in '85 we had the first CRX Si, and a D16A1 swap put those firmly in the 14.8-15.0, and they handle at least as well through the twisties as an AE86.
01-06-2007, 02:04 PM
#55
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Eh, I missed reading that. No, sorry, in '85 we had the first CRX Si, and a D16A1 swap put those firmly in the 14.8-15.0, and they handle at least as well through the twisties as an AE86.
vs.
lets not forget the fact that if toyota would have kept selling the starlet and its small rwd cars here in the US then the civic never would have been so popular. in almost every other market in the world toyota and nissan dominate the aftermarket while hondas are more of a less popular cult car.
08-12-2007, 12:32 PM
#58
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 997
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Originally Posted by 97EconoBox
What is with all these dipshits bumping old *** posts. no one cares about your opinions on a 7+ month old thread.
08-12-2007, 12:57 PM
#59
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 752
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Originally Posted by 97EconoBox
What is with all these dipshits bumping old *** posts. no one cares about your opinions on a 7+ month old thread.
