turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
#41
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
It's a shame that a good Toyota body to put those engines in is hard to come by, atleast where I live. What else can you put those motors in that is fairly inexpensive? Body wise that is... ( <5k )
I always wanted a Toyota
I always wanted a Toyota
#42
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
car looks a lot better in those pictures except for all the holes in the front bumper.
ive always liked those cars and i almost bought one, but it wasn't going to keep the bumble bee motor
ive always liked those cars and i almost bought one, but it wasn't going to keep the bumble bee motor
#44
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Originally Posted by Snafubmx234
Stop making me want to get another 'Yota.
#48
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
I know you're not the most literate Johnny in the apple cart, so why don't you re-read it and tell me what it means?
While you're at it, I'd like to see video of your Stang at the track, and third party verification that it does indeed get 50 mpg.
While you're at it, I'd like to see video of your Stang at the track, and third party verification that it does indeed get 50 mpg.
#49
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
I know you're not the most literate Johnny in the apple cart, so why don't you re-read it and tell me what it means?
While you're at it, I'd like to see video of your Stang at the track, and third party verification that it does indeed get 50 mpg.
While you're at it, I'd like to see video of your Stang at the track, and third party verification that it does indeed get 50 mpg.