|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by random-strike
you can get a vw bug to run faster than a stock gt, so what ::)
ricer arguement :) |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by Whitey
s
Its not a ricer arguement, your always pointing out superior cars that go fast and doesn't cost alot. You can buy a TT Viper from Hennesy off the showroom floor that puts out 1000hp and costs less than a a Ford GT. Its like comparing an NSX to Z06 you just get more for your money ;) |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
not as many pictures as i was expecting
|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by random-strike
ya but it doesnt mean the gt isnt cool :)
exactly..from our other thread it doesnt mean a nismo skyline isn't cool either ;) https://www.homemadeturbo.com/forum/...?topic=61478.0 |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by BlackDragon
exactly..from our other thread it doesnt mean a nismo skyline isn't cool either ;) https://www.homemadeturbo.com/forum/...?topic=61478.0 |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by Whitey
s
Its not a ricer arguement, your always pointing out superior cars that go fast and doesn't cost alot. You can buy a TT Viper from Hennesy off the showroom floor that puts out 1000hp and costs less than a a Ford GT. Its like comparing an NSX to Z06 you just get more for your money ;) |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by Whitey
You can buy a TT Viper from Hennesy off the showroom floor that puts out 1000hp and costs less than a a Ford GT.
John Hennesy is a crook at best (do a search for his name and law suits, you'll catch on quick) On top of that, the few cars that the owners actually received, all belw up in short order. John recently bought one of out local tracks and is having a hard time getting patrons as anyone in the know avoids him like the Plague. |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by EGgyLShatch
Ok, I give props to you whitey for having sweet projects like your tt stang and the fuel injected turbo banshee, and I just can't imagine how you would ever make the comparison between the nsx and the zo6. Not only is the NSX a way sexier and more refined vehicle, but GM is the very symbol of substandard engineering and quality control. The 7 liter 8 cylinder engine producing 505 horsepower is a joke compared to any performance minded engine that honda puts out, and thats a proven fact-- the nsx puts out more horsepower per liter than any engine gm has ever produced. Thats true of all of honda's performance engines, especially the f20c-- 240 hp out of an NA 2.0l engine. If GM was anywhere near the qualilty and control of honda, its 7 liter uber engine slushbox for the (gay, small penis compensation) corvette would produce at least 700 hp stock from the factory, and then it would only be matching the B16 engine that honda produced over 10 years ago. Its smaller price tag only relates is poor quality. If it was to match the output of an S2000 it would have 980hp, and we're talking factory numbers. Not to mention every old white man and his mother owns a corvette. The NSX is on a level of its own, a level way above that of a shitbox corvette
too bad honda cant tune for anything other than hp and forgets all about torque. look at tuned up na honda engines and there is almost always a nice high hp # but a relatively low lb ft of tq. i love honda and my car but it doesnt mean i'm going to ----- my self out to the facist ideas that it is the one and only and is the best there ever was is and will be. i honestly am not a fan of most domestic cars but i'm not closeminded enough to not notice the fact that occaisionally a beautifully built well done car comes along. get out of your mothers basement and get a life now if i were a moderatore i'd notice how far off topic this thread has gotten and unless brought back on topic, it'd be locked. for the sake of the continuation i'll let you blow me and continue on my merry way discussing how i prefer the old gt40 compared to the new gt. few things beat a classic. especially when they are poorly done. i've had the privilage to actually ride in a gt, and yes, they are fabulous to ride in. more so compared to my little 3 grand accord. i'd still take something else over a gt, for ex, my opinion stating, the 06 zo6. if you cant get over that, go hang yourself stupid ------- nignog |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Except for the NigNog, 5th Gen you made a good post. Good WOrk :6
|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
:6
|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
i love the specific output ricer battles.
|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by EGgyLShatch
Ok, I give props to you whitey for having sweet projects like your tt stang and the fuel injected turbo banshee, and I just can't imagine how you would ever make the comparison between the nsx and the zo6. Not only is the NSX a way sexier and more refined vehicle, but GM is the very symbol of substandard engineering and quality control. The 7 liter 8 cylinder engine producing 505 horsepower is a joke compared to any performance minded engine that honda puts out, and thats a proven fact-- the nsx puts out more horsepower per liter than any engine gm has ever produced. Thats true of all of honda's performance engines, especially the f20c-- 240 hp out of an NA 2.0l engine. If GM was anywhere near the qualilty and control of honda, its 7 liter uber engine slushbox for the (gay, small penis compensation) corvette would produce at least 700 hp stock from the factory, and then it would only be matching the B16 engine that honda produced over 10 years ago. Its smaller price tag only relates is poor quality. If it was to match the output of an S2000 it would have 980hp, and we're talking factory numbers. Not to mention every old white man and his mother owns a corvette. The NSX is on a level of its own, a level way above that of a shitbox corvette
An NSX is an overpriced underpowered car bottom line. Like I said before an NSX should be on the same level as a G35, not a $90,000 car. ---- if you want to compare HP to liter arguements than a 370cc Banshee motor puts out 472hp per liter so even your S2000 motor is an inferior design. :l
Originally Posted by Alex in Houston
You really need to live in the Houston area to understand why that is such a bullshit statement.
John Hennesy is a crook at best (do a search for his name and law suits, you'll catch on quick) On top of that, the few cars that the owners actually received, all belw up in short order. John recently bought one of out local tracks and is having a hard time getting patrons as anyone in the know avoids him like the Plague. Yeah I'm aware of the lawsuits, I just posted that becuase whenever someone posts a supercar Johnny always compares it to a domestic that puts out more power at a cheaper price. I didn't think people would get all bent out of shape becuase of it. :S
Originally Posted by random-strike
ya but it doesnt mean the gt isnt cool :)
Yeah its cool but for the price I'd choose something else ;) |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by Whitey
An NSX is an overpriced underpowered car bottom line. Like I said before an NSX should be on the same level as a G35, not a $90,000 car. ---- if you want to compare HP to liter arguements than a 370cc Banshee motor puts out 472hp per liter so even your S2000 motor is an inferior design. :l Yeah I'm aware of the lawsuits, I just posted that becuase whenever someone posts a supercar Johnny always compares it to a domestic that puts out more power at a cheaper price. I didn't think people would get all bent out of shape becuase of it. :S Yeah its cool but for the price I'd choose something else ;) |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by random-strike
id get a c6 z06, but i like the ford too! and the srt10 viper!!! hard choice
|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by Whitey
I'd buy an NSX since it is superior to ever other car ever made. :S
14 flat here i come! |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by random-strike
yeap 290crank hp and even less hp really melts my butter.
14 flat here i come! That GT is sick. Gotta love the haters. Some people who know they will never have anything nice, just hate instead of giving props. Most of the times its because there penis is small. |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by Dibble
Dont be silly. They run 12.90s. GOSH!!!!!!!
That GT is sick. Gotta love the haters. Some people who know they will never have anything nice, just hate instead of giving props. Most of the times its because there penis is small. and in the early 90 the corvette was anyhwere from a low 14 sec car to a high 13 sec car...except for the ZR-1 model which was a 12 sec car. so the nsx and corvette were pretty dead track even back then and it was only a v6. |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
whats so impressive about hondas ::) Hell, even the fast hondas arn't fast when you bring up any other car company. dont bring up the hp per liter arguement, you should know that static displacement = more potential for power. most american cars are choked up so you can easily make more power if you want to. but they cant exactly go selling 5.7 liter 120hp per liter engines to everyone and their mom who wants a truck or a camaro can they? why do import kids have to hate on EVERYTHING AMERICAN. most of you guys turbo d16's and cant keep up with the local lt1 i/h/e/ rear end gears camaro at the track. ::)
|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by random-strike
you're crazy id rather have a bone stock gt than my tt stang. no q asked
gt can be a dailey, they get ~24-26mpg highway. its better than drivin a v8 truck :) |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by FastLS
According to Top Gear the GT40(or GT I forgot which was the correct name) is rated at 4MPG.
Fuel Fuel Tank Capacity: 17.5 gal. EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway) Manual: 13 mpg / 21 mpg Range in Miles: (City/Highway) Manual: 227.5 mi. / 367.5 mi. |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by BlackDragon
rarely the hit 12's its mostly a low 13 sec car. that pretty impessive since it only has 290 hp to the crank. The reason because its such a light vehicle. honda had 16 years to think of a new design and power for the new nsx. When it first came out it was very impressive for its time...just overpriced. Im sure they are going to impress us again with the new model.
and in the early 90 the corvette was anyhwere from a low 14 sec car to a high 13 sec car...except for the ZR-1 model which was a 12 sec car. so the nsx and corvette were pretty dead track even back then and it was only a v6. and the nsx isnt that light. it weights what 3100lbs? my mustang weights that much |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by FastLS
According to Top Gear the GT40(or GT I forgot which was the correct name) is rated at 4MPG.
that show is competely biased, and the LIE constantly on that show. that show is not a real car show, it is entertainment. |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
1991 Acura NSX 5.8 14.4
1992 Acura NSX 5.6 13.9 1993 Acura NSX 5.6 13.9 1994 Acura NSX 5.3 13.6 1996 Acura NSX 5.2 13.8 1996 Acura NSX-T 5.8 14.3 1997 Acura NSX-T 4.8 13.3 2001 Acura NSX V6 4.5 12.9 (C&D TV 2001) 2002 Acura NSX 4.8 13.4 On average, high 13 low 14 car like johnny said. Curb Weight: 3160 lbs. for the NSX Curb Weight: 2827 lbs. for the Mustang GT 5.0 hatch So its actually lighter, haha. The NSX has more hp, the 5.0 has much more torque |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Maybe I have a very creative imagination, or a dirty one....
http://www.turbofordgt.com/jfgtdyno05.gif Doesn't it kind of look like the BOV is about to ass rape the intake piping? |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by N1ghtM0nkey
Maybe I have a very creative imagination, or a dirty one....
Doesn't it kind of look like the BOV is about to ass rape the intake piping? |
Re: turbo ford gt . com
The GT makes Vipers look like neons..
|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Haha whoa I see some people really didn't like my post. Don't get me wrong, I love Ford and the Ford GT. I just really don't have much respect for chevy, and like 5thgenlx said, thats just my opinion. I read an article in USA today a few weeks ago that talked about the top cars of 06 and rated a lot of car companies in respect to the average number of new cars that had problems out of every 100. All the japanese makes scored 10-11, ford i believe was maybe 14, chevy was a little higher, maybe 16? I don't remember the exact numbers, but one prop to chevy would be that the german companies did a lot worse, in the high teens and low 20's, with I believe porsche scoring the worst because of their cayenne SUV's. I never said Honda was the greatest car company or that the nsx was the greatest sports car. Personally I will never own a sports car at all--even if I won one I'd sell it and buy myself a civic and keep the extra cash. ANYWAY, the Ford GT is a pimp car.
|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
what the hell? I also said back then it was dead even with the corvette which was a high 13 sec and 14 sec car. the nsx now is a low 13 sec car. And it does not weight 3100 pounds :P
|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Um, yes it does.
|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
I dont know ---- about cars I will never have :-X
|
Re: turbo ford gt . com
just found a link to a short vid if no one else has seen it yet
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/1...8D7D6B0801.htm |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands