Re:supercharger vs. turbocharger
 

I've never seen a supercharger do 30psi boost. Superchargers just aren't up to the task of making serious power in a street car.

Re:supercharger vs. turbocharger
 

M90 is a lot bigger then the rinky dink M34 or M36 that Jackson racing is selling.

Re:supercharger vs. turbocharger
 

you realey ever see a supercharger with 300+ hp especially on a 4 cylinder

Re:supercharger vs. turbocharger
 

http://www.hotrod.com/featuredvehicles/22838/index.html

Claims 487 horsepower at 7300 RPM's ;)

Re:supercharger vs. turbocharger
 

yeah on 27 psi with a compression at 11.2:1 ;D

Re:supercharger vs. turbocharger
 

haha, i hope he has that ---- tuned like woah

Re:supercharger vs. turbocharger
 

That guy (larry) is a motor genius. Try this link:
http://homepage.mac.com/dgiessel/.Mo...ndynCivic.mpeg

Re:supercharger vs. turbocharger
 

Super chargers take power to make power.they are more eficient on low reving engines.They become inefficient at high rpm.Its also a pain in the but to raise boost(you have to change pullys and belts most the time).

How do you figure that the intake charge pressure is greater?Psi is psi no matter how its created.CFM on the other hand can be different depending on the size of compressor.

I dont believe that.The turbine(hot)side of the turbo works by sucking out that gasses out of the cylinders after combustion.The wheels on a turbo opose each other.The compressor sucks the air in and the turbins sucks it out.

I think turbos are more efficient when the engine is properly tuned and the charge air is properly cooled.Think about it.Its creating power from a power source(exhaust gasses)that is present no matter what.

Re:supercharger vs. turbocharger
 

lmao

plently of built SVT COBRAS run 30psi from big roots types.

centrifugals are capable of over 30psi too.

Re:supercharger vs. turbocharger
 

one of a kind, and how much money did that take? i say TURBO