|
Starion vs. Turbo si
I just got my dsm 1g mas on today and so i called my friend to see how well i put up against him now. he has a 99 civic si with a t3/t4 turbo and front mount with hondata, tuned 7psi and dyno'd at 225 hp. Everytime we raced before he would walk me like there was no tomarrow. This time we went and i pulled on him intell about 60 (i hit fuel cut) his front bumper was on my back bumper. lol So overall i am very impressed with my car. i dont have that many mods at all. i have a full 3 inch exhaust, 15 psi and a dsm 1g mas. just wanted to share my story because i didnt think i had a chance against him.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
whats the point of quoting him, without replying?
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
do u guys have a rough estimate what my friends civic would run in the 1/4 ?
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
Originally Posted by turbotrep
do u guys have a rough estimate what my friends civic would run in the 1/4 ?
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
he ran 15.5 stock. so ur saying with a t3/t4 turbo he only lost a half second ?!?
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
Originally Posted by turbotrep
he ran 15.5 stock. so ur saying with a t3/t4 turbo he only lost a half second ?!?
This isn't an E-racing forum. ::) Tell your friend to stop being a bitch and take it to the track |
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
ibwl - in before whiteys lock
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
Originally Posted by Whitey
Originally Posted by turbotrepcockmaster)9000
I just got my dsm 1g mas on today and so i called my friend to see how well i put up against him now. he has a 99 civic si with a t3/t4 turbo and front mount with hondata, tuned 7psi and dyno'd at 225 hp. Everytime we raced before he would walk me like there was no tomarrow. This time we went and i pulled on ???(why the hell did I quote this) ??? him intell about 60 (i hit fuel cut) his front bumper was on my back bumper. lol So overall i am very impressed with my car. i dont have that many mods at all. i have a full 3 inch exhaust, 15 psi and a dsm 1g mas. just wanted to share my story because i didnt think i had a chance against him.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
Cool !!! Another person with a TT 3S like me, and someone that has a Starion to go with his "starion IC" !!
Ok... ummm... What... 2.6L running twice the boost as a 1.6L and wins by almost a car.... Just pulling your chain man... I give you props for having a Starion ( I think there cool, and I'm not peri-recen hehehe ). The starion really really really needs a bigger turbo !! Almost as bad as the VR4s !! your friends civic ( I'm guessing ) runs in the high 13's ( best run, prob. inconcesatly ), but the cool part is that you hung with him from 0-60, the bad news is that you have RWD and should own him 0-60 by a lot !!! His car isn't going to "hook-up" very well on normal tires, but your car should... DO YOURSELF A FAVOR and NNNNNEEEEEVVVEEERRRR race him from a roll !!! Hehehe... It wouldn't be pretty.... If you loss faith in the Starion, I'll buy it, hehe ( I perfer the conquest though.. ) |
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
the starion and conquest are the same cars.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
no i got first dibbs on the starion.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
Originally Posted by kain
the starion and conquest are the same cars.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
like what do you mean? their exactly the same.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
The 2.0 starion is faster than the 2.6 starion, it's only 11hp less than the 2.6 stock (177 vs 188) but it weighs a lot less too.
It would be interesting to get a 2.0 starion (4G63 engine) and swap in a 4G63 from a turbo DSM. The gains are a better flowing head and multipoint fuel injection. |
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
An N/A 2.0L in the 80's making 177hp was the ---- !!! I bet turbo RX7s didn't make that much ( in real world, not the play world of "rotory guys" )...
SIde note... RX-8 = 155LBS. of torque !!! Dumb asses !! |
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
Originally Posted by baldur
It would be interesting to get a 2.0 starion (4G63 engine) and swap in a 4G63 from a turbo DSM. The gains are a better flowing head and multipoint fuel injection.
Originally Posted by 89dxhunchback
SIde note... RX-8 = 155LBS. of torque !!! Dumb asses !!
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
The turbo 2.0L in the starion was 177hp. It's not really an efficient motor, 8 valves, choking head, choking intake manifold with a tiny little throttle body and TBI fuel injection.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
Originally Posted by baldur
The turbo 2.0L in the starion was 177hp. It's not really an efficient motor, 8 valves, choking head, choking intake manifold with a tiny little throttle body and TBI fuel injection.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
That's where the DSM engine makes sense, it's should bolt right in since it's the same basic engine block.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
the 2.0 was never in a starion. it was alwase a 2.7 and the 4g63 bolts right up to the tranny.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
the 2.0 motors in the starion only came in the jdm market.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
We had a handful of 2.0 starions here in Iceland.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
Originally Posted by Rx7toStarion
the 2.0 motors in the starion only came in the jdm market.
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
I'd like to see a 4g63-->Starion swap. ;D
|
Re:Starion vs. Turbo si
Originally Posted by SinisterCRX
I'd like to see a 4g63-->Starion swap. ;D
It was at "battle of the rotarys", I mean " battle of the imports". |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands