thompson won the debate???
#1
thompson won the debate???
fox says
http://youtube.com/watch?v=9FUaZWUpDAU
but when the truth comes out.. guess what
http://youtube.com/watch?v=auFYQY_iOQ0&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=If9EWDB_zK4&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5HJaxDt0EbY&feature=related
---- fox, ---- this frank guy.. ---- this.. go ron paul... ron paul for president.. FOX SHOULD BE TAKEN OFF THE ----------ING AIR
http://youtube.com/watch?v=9FUaZWUpDAU
but when the truth comes out.. guess what
http://youtube.com/watch?v=auFYQY_iOQ0&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=If9EWDB_zK4&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5HJaxDt0EbY&feature=related
---- fox, ---- this frank guy.. ---- this.. go ron paul... ron paul for president.. FOX SHOULD BE TAKEN OFF THE ----------ING AIR
#5
Re: thompson won the debate???
just watched the highlights, thats the best debate i've seen so far ( i have seen all of them on both sides) DR paul ------- nailed them on more than one occasion, chris would that be dohc or sohc zc?
#6
Re: thompson won the debate???
OMFG i guess they forgot to edit out the applaus
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWD-7FvyQWs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWD-7FvyQWs
#9
Re: thompson won the debate???
this just in...
ron paul is anti american.. LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rdui...eature=related
ron paul is anti american.. LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rdui...eature=related
#10
Re: thompson won the debate???
One more reason for me to not watch Fox News... thanks. When Paul says things that make sense, but also go against popular views, people get shaken up.
What I'm liking is there's the possibility that Ron Paul can take enough votes to take away the presidency from another candidate. In order to win the election you have to have the majority of the electoral votes (270 or more votes). If someone takes a decently sized Rep state and a decently sized Dem state that means that theoretically no one is elected. Does anyone think this is a plausible outcome, or is Paul too far behind in the primary polls to do this? Give your thoughts.
What I'm liking is there's the possibility that Ron Paul can take enough votes to take away the presidency from another candidate. In order to win the election you have to have the majority of the electoral votes (270 or more votes). If someone takes a decently sized Rep state and a decently sized Dem state that means that theoretically no one is elected. Does anyone think this is a plausible outcome, or is Paul too far behind in the primary polls to do this? Give your thoughts.