CspecRun

I know a person whom has helped set up 2 vehicles that are using a "SIMILIAR" type of configuration, or whatever the hell you want to call it. It's 2 work trucks actually...one is driven to FL from south GA 5 or 6 days of the week. I hate to repeat how he told me it worked because I don't remember exactly how it went and I don't wanna sound like a fool. He said they only kept the gasoline fuel system intact to lubricate the engine(gasoline is oil based??) He told me that a man in Canada had gotten like 2,000 miles out of an engine off of 4?? oz's of water THAT MAYBE COMPLETELY WRONG, but it was #'s of a mind boggling proportion to me. I hate to think of the day when petro-powered cars are done for(maybe I'll be gone 1st), but I guess we need to have something already thought out in the event it happens sooner than we think.

Dx 101

the smart side of me thinks this is cool and interesting and would want to hop on it but the realistic side of me says what the ---- is wrong with everyone trying to get more out of gas because of hi gas prices. why dont we all over throw those big time oil barons and make them lower prices. mexico has better prices for the same ----. wtf. its like fat people wanting food people to make less fatting food. no lard *** get up and run. its like those old guys that have bad blood cerculation(due to bad eating) and pop viagra to sex up a prostitue cuz his wife is fat too. no you stupid limp dick fat ------- bastard hang yourself.


but either way, why dont we all just invest in a rotory if you want hydroden power?. lets all do that i dunno maybe its just cuz i have been walking more and sleeping less and the US sucks

hondacivc93

god can you imagine the prices of bottled water after they figure out cars can run on the ----?

but a few years ago i did see a thing on a race car a company built that they just filled the tank with water from a garden hose and it ran for 24hours staright at 187 mph. pretty ------ sweet. i wonder if i could find the article?

rsmith2786

Put the science aside. Why aren't the big companies doing it? I work for GE Energy / Oil & Gas and the literally spend BILLIONS on "research" but somehow they missed this? There are so many companies that would be on this faster than J. Davis on orange chicken its not even funny. If it worked the guy would be selling $5,000 setups instead of $50 plans. It just doesn't make sense. I am stubborn and question everything but this is something i would love to be proved wrong about.

The first one of you that gets my civic to do 2,000 miles on even a whole gallon of water without blowing the car up and no outside inputs gets 25 grand. I am not even kidding. My car...with a totally self contained system that will last for at least 20,000 miles. If you can do it i guarantee i can make a hell of a lot more than 25 grand on it. We'll never have to work again.

SDRAWKCAB

Well first of all the space shuttle runs on nothing but water power.
It is water that has already went threw hydrolysis. Meaning that its just 2 tanks one of oxygen and one of hydrogen.
O2 isn't that reactive compared to O.
O2 is found naturally were as O has to be produced.
H H O is what you get from hydrolysis which only takes a small spark to make a massive explosion, and needs no external substances to burn. One reason I know for sure is that if you got in a car accident with a tank of O and H you and the 3 cars next to you would go bye bye.

---- honda just released 600 hydrogen cars on lease to see how they fair, but they are using hydrogen tanks and using air for the oxidizer. Not pure O

rsmith2786

First of all, most of the power pushing the space shuttle into space is sold fuel not water. The new space shuttle will run on gel fuels. The most important flaw with what you said is that the space shuttle runs on nothing but water power. Thats is where all of this goes wrong. Hydrogen and Oxygen are not the same as water. There is a very important fundamental difference. You are correct that O is much more reactive than O2 but what you failed to realize is that at standard temp. and pressure two O atoms bind to form O2.

Basically what i am getting as is nothing "runs" on water. You can put a ---- ton of energy INTO the water and get something that will give you LESS energy in return.

ifly87

I think you're all forgetting about the whole hond$t$ deal with pgmfi.org, lol. with that downloader posted its only a matter of time before hmt has a lawsuit on its hands.

1991civicsi

HHO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfr-Y...eature=related


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__pv_...eature=related
LOL skip to 50

Chris Harris

HHO is bullshit in my opinion after spending about 10 hours reading/researching a while back

there are supposedly people that are running more efficient setups, running less amperage and outputting 4 times as much Hydrogen.

But something about having the Hindenburg under the hood of my car scares me