buk9tp

hes not pro marajuana per se but he would legalize it cause its a victimless crime

http://youtube.com/watch?v=yCM_wQy4YVg

buk9tp

dude the media makes it look like hes the next perot but ron paul is well beyond that.. people compare him to ralph nader thats ------- bs dude read up on em all polls show that he's someone to barter with and then everyone claims his followers are skewing the polls

idk look at all the buzz sorrounding him... watch the debates.. this dudes ------- real lol

SkunT

from my reading on wiki reading he has no chance in hell. You comparing him to Ross is perfect.

Paul supports
Free trade - trade as you will....
Altering the military's "don't ask, don't tell" - I only hope he is going to alter it in such away as to say 'no gays', there is a huge loophole in the dont ask dont tell policy.
Tighter border security - amen
Gun ownership -leave it to the states to decide, though you should be able to own a gun, if you desire. Gun control should be the situation, not gun ownership...
Free speech - sweet.
Voluntary school prayer - I agre
Return to free market health care controled free market health care...


He opposes
abortion why would you oppose it. Free-choice. Ive been there, done that...it should be a choice.
federal use of capital punishment WTF is he thinking. Kill me, Kill you.
membership in NAFTA and the WTO why would you oppose this?
the income tax lets let everone live for free...
the REAL ID Act i cant speak on this
universal health care ok..
the federal War on Drugs drugs are good. yeah... who cares what happens with drugs
federal regulation of marriage though i'm not a supporter of gays, this is America.
foreign interventionism and foreign aid - so how would we support ourselves if you eliminate income tax and foreign aid? or does he not support giving to other countries? Nothing wrong with helping another country...quit being so ------- greedy
He advocates withdrawal from NATO and the United Nations for reasons of national sovereignty -um yeah. we'd be fucked.
Paul has asserted that he does not think there should be any federal control over education and instead believes it should be handled at a local and state level. - not be any federal control...state controlled... so if you live in CA, and are held to a standard, and then move to MN, what you were held to in CA wouldnt suffice...sounds like a plan to me. :1

This guy is right up there with oboma and hillary IMO.

buk9tp

watch his resoning behind what he says go watch the debates on youtube

stillnoturbo

I'm voting for Bush again. I'm just gonna write his name on the ballot since he can't run again. I just like the word bush. That ---- tickles my nose.

SkunT

I guess I should just say it now...

click

jinxy

Giuliani is a lying sack of ----.


http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=21713

read pls.

HondaTuner

Giuliani...



'nuff said.

BTW Frank, talk to most teachers about our "education system" and they'd probably agree with what ron paul stated. Theres so much bs with teaching... bleh

btw, ---- the UN/Nato...

AWDstylez

Exactly. If you think that the federal government is supposed to have more power and more control than state governments than you're a sadly misinformed product of public education. Exactly what they want you to be. The federal government is there for the purposes of uniting the states, dealing with inter-state issues, and dealing with international issues. It's not supposed to govern your daily life, police you etc that's the states' jobs.

MikeJ-2009

Well, only 2 days after I put the gif in my signature, someone noticed. Excellent.

I'm not trying to be a bumper sticker liberal, shoving politicians in your face and telling you you're wrong if you don't agree. The point was for YOU to look into it. Most of America don't have a fucken clue when it comes to politics, they let the media/public opinion decide for them. My point is that I don't think the government runs anything efficiently, they're all hypocrites, and they don't really give a ---- because they've got your money to play with. The government is the only institution that has a monopoly on most everything they do (monopoly= high price + low service), and when they fail, they get MORE OF YOUR MONEY to ---- up with.
Anyway, inform yourself and decide who you like. That's what I'm saying. In the age of the internet, there's plenty for you to investigate and come up with your own conclusion.

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/

Brief Overview of Congressman Paul’s Record:

He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.

He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.

He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.

Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.



That's what the two parties like to hear. The truth is that the people decide. Once we get over this one or the other (hand picked by the parties and the parties pocketbooks), we'll actually have a reason to vote. Stand on some principles, can we please?