red 5.0 turbo vs DSM
03-14-2006, 12:45 AM
#11
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: red 5.0 turbo vs DSM
Originally Posted by Anubis_4_99
he didnt say he was AWD, there are FWD turbo models
Originally Posted by Anubis_4_99
and to the poster, if your on stock internals i wouldnt suggest 22psi.. go with 18, you'll be happy enough, i ran 21 in mine but that was because i didnt care if it blew or not.. surpriseingly it survived me beating on it every day for 4 months, then a new owner for almost a year before it blew
Kinda funny, the 160K bottom end was put in to make it to a race while waiting for bearings for a built shortblock, they decided not to yank it until it blew. It hasn't, been about 9 months now. The transfer case is another miracle item, they change the lube in it every oil change (1500 miles) and it's lube is laced with metallic glitter... yet... it... will... not... die.
03-14-2006, 12:47 AM
#12
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 15
Re: red 5.0 turbo vs DSM
Originally Posted by random-strike
Hey, thats was me. i didnt give you the thumbs down on purpose i meant the thumbs the first time. that was my bad
welcome to the site
i was running about 6psi
welcome to the site
i was running about 6psi
Lots of respect witht he car, our cars were dirty as hell, and I felt like an idiot with only 11 psi barely pulling, but that ****** sounded nice, RFL?
Believe it or not, I almost got a black 5.0 exactly like yours and Iw as planning on doing an all motor track -----.
My dad had a 71 vega crammed with a 350, and running 9's has alot of experience with big motors
But I cant afford the damn gas, this is actually the first time I got to drive my car running WELL.
and I'm still getting used to the act, so I knew you were going to walk all over me like a stock civic vs a supra.
whats your aim?
03-14-2006, 12:50 AM
#13
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,427
Re: red 5.0 turbo vs DSM
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Yes, and I've seen one FWD DSM stepped on vs 193287.238473839X10^17 AWD models.
Building a (1G) 4G63 is the most assinine suggestion I've ever heard. GVR-4 #366/2000 runs 30-whatsis psi on a stock 160K mile bottom end, and has done so with total impunity for the last 15K miles. T04E .60 trim slipped into a Mitsu turbine housing, 880cc injectors, keydiver ECU, GM MAF-T, 2.5-3" stainless IC pipe, HKS cams and Evo8 sodium filled valves (that ---- is mad cheap), huge FMIC. I don't know how much boost it runs, and no one really does... it hits 25 psi in 1st gear, taps the peg on or about the 32 psi mark for a moment in 2nd, and stays solid against the peg in 3rd-5th. Best 1/8th is 7.6@92 mph with traction problems. Car is ungutted, and pristine in every way. All hail Exxon 110 octane.
Kinda funny, the 160K bottom end was put in to make it to a race while waiting for bearings for a built shortblock, they decided not to yank it until it blew. It hasn't, been about 9 months now. The transfer case is another miracle item, they change the lube in it every oil change (1500 miles) and it's lube is laced with metallic glitter... yet... it... will... not... die.
Building a (1G) 4G63 is the most assinine suggestion I've ever heard. GVR-4 #366/2000 runs 30-whatsis psi on a stock 160K mile bottom end, and has done so with total impunity for the last 15K miles. T04E .60 trim slipped into a Mitsu turbine housing, 880cc injectors, keydiver ECU, GM MAF-T, 2.5-3" stainless IC pipe, HKS cams and Evo8 sodium filled valves (that ---- is mad cheap), huge FMIC. I don't know how much boost it runs, and no one really does... it hits 25 psi in 1st gear, taps the peg on or about the 32 psi mark for a moment in 2nd, and stays solid against the peg in 3rd-5th. Best 1/8th is 7.6@92 mph with traction problems. Car is ungutted, and pristine in every way. All hail Exxon 110 octane.
Kinda funny, the 160K bottom end was put in to make it to a race while waiting for bearings for a built shortblock, they decided not to yank it until it blew. It hasn't, been about 9 months now. The transfer case is another miracle item, they change the lube in it every oil change (1500 miles) and it's lube is laced with metallic glitter... yet... it... will... not... die.
i had the same thing with my transfer case, i thought the tranny would blow any day but it actuly held up surpriseingly well
03-14-2006, 12:50 AM
#14
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: red 5.0 turbo vs DSM
its a dsm bov. but when you cram a shitload of air through them they sound different. it blows off like 3 times at 6psi. it goes PSSSSSSH squeeek sqqueeeek too much air for i think.
ya i thought you were all stock with fart can by the way you caught up to me after i let off.
22psi should give it a kick in the pants though eh
ya i thought you were all stock with fart can by the way you caught up to me after i let off.
22psi should give it a kick in the pants though eh
03-14-2006, 12:55 AM
#16
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 15
Re: red 5.0 turbo vs DSM
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Yes, and I've seen one FWD DSM stepped on vs 193287.238473839X10^17 AWD models.
Building a (1G) 4G63 is the most assinine suggestion I've ever heard. GVR-4 #366/2000 runs 30-whatsis psi on a stock 160K mile bottom end, and has done so with total impunity for the last 15K miles. T04E .60 trim slipped into a Mitsu turbine housing, 880cc injectors, keydiver ECU, GM MAF-T, 2.5-3" stainless IC pipe, HKS cams and Evo8 sodium filled valves (that ---- is mad cheap), huge FMIC. I don't know how much boost it runs, and no one really does... it hits 25 psi in 1st gear, taps the peg on or about the 32 psi mark for a moment in 2nd, and stays solid against the peg in 3rd-5th. Best 1/8th is 7.6@92 mph with traction problems. Car is ungutted, and pristine in every way. All hail Exxon 110 octane.
Kinda funny, the 160K bottom end was put in to make it to a race while waiting for bearings for a built shortblock, they decided not to yank it until it blew. It hasn't, been about 9 months now. The transfer case is another miracle item, they change the lube in it every oil change (1500 miles) and it's lube is laced with metallic glitter... yet... it... will... not... die.
Building a (1G) 4G63 is the most assinine suggestion I've ever heard. GVR-4 #366/2000 runs 30-whatsis psi on a stock 160K mile bottom end, and has done so with total impunity for the last 15K miles. T04E .60 trim slipped into a Mitsu turbine housing, 880cc injectors, keydiver ECU, GM MAF-T, 2.5-3" stainless IC pipe, HKS cams and Evo8 sodium filled valves (that ---- is mad cheap), huge FMIC. I don't know how much boost it runs, and no one really does... it hits 25 psi in 1st gear, taps the peg on or about the 32 psi mark for a moment in 2nd, and stays solid against the peg in 3rd-5th. Best 1/8th is 7.6@92 mph with traction problems. Car is ungutted, and pristine in every way. All hail Exxon 110 octane.
Kinda funny, the 160K bottom end was put in to make it to a race while waiting for bearings for a built shortblock, they decided not to yank it until it blew. It hasn't, been about 9 months now. The transfer case is another miracle item, they change the lube in it every oil change (1500 miles) and it's lube is laced with metallic glitter... yet... it... will... not... die.
HAHAHA I HAVE a GVR4 motor, I bought the 6 bolt from my friend that has a galant. hence the 6 bolt swap. has 130k on motor 175k on the car.
I have stock internals yes, and they are fine up to 400hp from what I've heard.
That galant sounds nice.
Visit www.ten-fifty-one.com 1051/2000
Galant runs 11's check out his site his Name is mark a friend of mine.
Whole underbody is flawlessly clean.
03-14-2006, 12:59 AM
#18
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 15
Re: red 5.0 turbo vs DSM
Originally Posted by random-strike
its a dsm bov. but when you cram a shitload of air through them they sound different. it blows off like 3 times at 6psi. it goes PSSSSSSH squeeek sqqueeeek too much air for i think.
ya i thought you were all stock with fart can by the way you caught up to me after i let off.
22psi should give it a kick in the pants though eh
ya i thought you were all stock with fart can by the way you caught up to me after i let off.
22psi should give it a kick in the pants though eh
no I'm not stock, glad you thought that though, I like the sleeper mode better. Thats what I'm going for.
nah I had 3rd WO, full boost like cmon ******! go go go.
good thing I saw the back window:-P
you gave me a thumbs down ******:-P My buddie was like wtf that guys a ****** hahaha, hes like his car was ugly, I was like STFU dude have respect that was sleeper and a half, and BTW I have a hard on for turbo V8's.
Aim PLZ
