Picked up the September SCC magazine.. disappointed
08-02-2005, 09:31 PM
#11
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,161
Re: Picked up the September SCC magazine.. disappointed
All around HMT must be the BEST on the earth. I was at the track Friday and there are some cars (SI super 60 Turbo) throwing down at best 14 flat. Street tires, but dang my single could do that. The all motors were impressive, but as for the turbo hondas.....phfft. I was soooooo dissappointed.
JP
JP
08-03-2005, 11:41 AM
#13
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,751
Re: Picked up the September SCC magazine.. disappointed
Ya, I thought the times where off for the power out put. Didn't the Mirage spit out an axle on one of there runs?
I still love the Sleeper-ability of a Junkyard Omni though!
I still love the Sleeper-ability of a Junkyard Omni though!
08-04-2005, 01:20 AM
#15
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 27
Re: Picked up the September SCC magazine.. disappointed
i read a post on the dodge board by the guy that owns the omni and the track was horrible. his omni ushally runs high 11's.
heres a link to the post.
http://www.turbododge.com/forums/showthread.php?t=94153
heres a link to the post.
http://www.turbododge.com/forums/showthread.php?t=94153
08-04-2005, 08:55 AM
#18
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Re: Picked up the September SCC magazine.. disappointed
Originally Posted by bumblezc
Didn't the Mirage spit out an axle on one of there runs?
08-09-2005, 06:47 AM
#19
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,089
Re: Picked up the September SCC magazine.. disappointed
they should stick to stealing any honda related articles from Honda Tuning.
1. The CRX that they said was an 88 was actually a 90-91 (corner lights, tail lights, door seat belts...)
2. They said the CRX Si had a 1.5l engine.
3. They suck.
1. The CRX that they said was an 88 was actually a 90-91 (corner lights, tail lights, door seat belts...)
2. They said the CRX Si had a 1.5l engine.
3. They suck.
