HomemadeTurbo - DIY Turbo Forum

HomemadeTurbo - DIY Turbo Forum (https://www.homemadeturbo.com/)
-   General Discussion (https://www.homemadeturbo.com/general-discussion-6/)
-   -   Nobody caught this? Internet Porn Ruling - bad news! (https://www.homemadeturbo.com/general-discussion-6/nobody-caught-internet-porn-ruling-bad-news-41667/)

Honda16hb 06-24-2005 06:42 PM

Re: Nobody caught this? Internet Porn Ruling - bad news!
 

Originally Posted by Spenser
according to this website.... there are some more mandates that might affect us further

http://www.alternet.org/story/11945/

wow, I had to quote you to say "we're not going to read that ----, tell us wtf is going on" in order to realize that if you just click on the link all of the important info is right there, not much reading to it.

NBLKID 06-24-2005 06:50 PM

Re: Nobody caught this? Internet Porn Ruling - bad news!
 
tubgirl strikes again :-X

spongerlbc 06-24-2005 08:54 PM

Re: Nobody caught this? Internet Porn Ruling - bad news!
 
So America is going to police the internet..... this should be funny.

G2turbo_terror 06-25-2005 01:58 AM

Re: Nobody caught this? Internet Porn Ruling - bad news!
 

Originally Posted by Mista_Shrpnl
So anyway, what I'm gathering at this point is:
If Bill or Jim want to post some nudie pics, they themselves are required to keep records of every model depicted with proof of age, blah blah etc. You might think only the actual "producer" or creator of the porn is required to do this, but I've seen on several sites that the law included "secondary producers" which is defined as: "the term 'secondary producer' is defined to include anyone who posts a digital image on an internet site, under 75.1 (c)(2). Secondary producers are the ones who are now being required to maintain this information."

So lets get this straight. Kain wants to post some porn, is kain considerd a "secondary producer" who legally is required to have proof of models age? -OR- Overnight pop up pay site is re-selling/posting pics of some slut that is considerd the "secondary producer"?

Mista_Shrpnl 06-25-2005 03:44 AM

Re: Nobody caught this? Internet Porn Ruling - bad news!
 

Originally Posted by G2turbo_terror
So lets get this straight. Kain wants to post some porn, is kain considerd a "secondary producer" who legally is required to have proof of models age?

Yep.

Republishing an erotic image - even if you're doing it simply for the purposes of criticism - requires you to keep the same age-verification records as the people who created that image.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands