no specs
 

http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1567097&page=1
I call bullshit, n

Re: no specs
 

I believe it.

Re: no specs
 

Re: no specs
 

Notice the questions blundar asks.

Geoff has been playing around with interesting parts combinations recently. When your manifold design assures near-perfect scavenging for a large bulk of the rpm band, designing a cam that gives gains over something designed to limit reversion is pretty ------- simple.

Re: no specs
 

:y

Re: no specs
 

They were using Skank2 Stage 2 faggot cams on one of their test mules, spooling GT4088 ~1500 rpms sooner with no loss of top end due to keeping expansive primaries. Now, go a hair more on duration (with an eye to LSA at cam settings 0,0) with a LOT more lift and we have a cam design meant to address a pressure wave manifold's scavenging characteristics AND flow serious airmass in a big boost application.

Re: no specs
 

its the fact that they dont show any specs, and they only do their tests on very high hp cars, oif you have a 300 hp car you wont gain ----, big ass turbos and a lots of boost, do it on a regular car and see what you gain, thats my argument.

Re: no specs
 

Oh, you'd gain on a 300 hp car, but rocker/valve/cam longevity would make those guys all butthurt.

For a "regular car" that's shooting 300-500, I'd go pressure-wave mani with mild NA cam and you'll be very happy with spool on what is traditionally known as a "large, laggy" turbine.

Re: no specs
 

Welcome to the world of camshafts. Many companies release cams and don't tell anyone the specs on them. Kinda sucks, huh?

More info on this pulsewave mani? I'm interested.

Re: no specs
 

I revealled all a couple years back.

Look for mattnteclipse's thread in GD, "little education." Observe that Stealthniggah is thick as a brick, but that's another subject entirely.