General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

Math wizards

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2006, 07:10 PM
  #21  
3.0 BAR
 
spoon fed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,368
Default Re: Math wizards

the answer is Turd Ferguson
spoon fed is offline  
Old 03-15-2006, 07:25 PM
  #22  
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
AgentMurdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 9,203
Default Re: Math wizards

welp, time to turn it in :1
AgentMurdoc is offline  
Old 03-16-2006, 09:06 PM
  #23  
3.0 BAR
 
d16forlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,857
Default Re: Math wizards

Thaks for the head ache Merdizzle .


I hate ---- Like this.It reminds me of Electrical Theory.I have never once had to use it.Ive forgotten all of it and trying to refresh only gives me a head ache.
d16forlife is offline  
Old 03-16-2006, 10:20 PM
  #24  
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
AgentMurdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 9,203
Default Re: Math wizards

you telling me. I turned it, maybe tomorrow I'll get it back. Hopefully I explained it correctly
AgentMurdoc is offline  
Old 03-16-2006, 10:32 PM
  #25  
3.0 BAR
 
kain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,448
Default Re: Math wizards

X< Chuck norris
kain is offline  
Old 03-16-2006, 10:50 PM
  #26  
3.0 BAR
 
Sinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,798
Default Re: Math wizards

if your trying to make a proof, that ---- is weak... beyond weak.

you should have tried proof by counter example or proof by induction.
Sinner is offline  
Old 03-16-2006, 11:43 PM
  #27  
1.5 BAR
 
dai the flu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 727
Default Re: Math wizards

good luck man. that confused the ---- out of me all 3 times i read it.

i think i'll go drink some vodka now to ease the pain.
dai the flu is offline  
Old 03-16-2006, 11:51 PM
  #28  
3.0 BAR
 
Darkelvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,612
Default Re: Math wizards

7. The answer is 7, right?
Darkelvis is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 12:22 AM
  #29  
0.0 BAR
 
straightupmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1
Default Re: Math wizards

i know this really doesn't help now that you had to turn it in, but using your definition of the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality and the theorem you can see:

1. the inequality is ≤, so the maximum of the cube root (which would be the maximum of the products also) is when the both sides of the inequality are equal. Your definition says that the equality holds only if a=b=c.

2. using this information, one can see that stu (or abc) would be the a maximun (have the highest cube root) when s=t=u (or a=b=c)

I hope this makes sense, and again I am sorry I didn't see until now.
straightupmad is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 02:33 AM
  #30  
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
AgentMurdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 9,203
Default Re: Math wizards

bah i'm done with that ----, and what was in the first post was the question being asked to me. Striaght out the ***** fucken project question. I'm still confused, but whatever.
AgentMurdoc is offline  


Quick Reply: Math wizards



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 PM.