Re: Math wizards
 

the answer is Turd Ferguson

Re: Math wizards
 

welp, time to turn it in :1

Re: Math wizards
 

Thaks for the head ache Merdizzle :-X.


I hate ---- Like this.It reminds me of Electrical Theory.I have never once had to use it.Ive forgotten all of it and trying to refresh only gives me a head ache.

Re: Math wizards
 

you telling me. I turned it, maybe tomorrow I'll get it back. Hopefully I explained it correctly :S

Re: Math wizards
 

X< Chuck norris

Re: Math wizards
 

if your trying to make a proof, that ---- is weak... beyond weak.

you should have tried proof by counter example or proof by induction.

Re: Math wizards
 

good luck man. that confused the ---- out of me all 3 times i read it. :S

i think i'll go drink some vodka now to ease the pain.

Re: Math wizards
 

7. The answer is 7, right? :y

Re: Math wizards
 

i know this really doesn't help now that you had to turn it in, but using your definition of the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality and the theorem you can see:

1. the inequality is ≤, so the maximum of the cube root (which would be the maximum of the products also) is when the both sides of the inequality are equal. Your definition says that the equality holds only if a=b=c.

2. using this information, one can see that stu (or abc) would be the a maximun (have the highest cube root) when s=t=u (or a=b=c)

I hope this makes sense, and again I am sorry I didn't see until now.

Re: Math wizards
 

bah i'm done with that ----, and what was in the first post was the question being asked to me. Striaght out the mutha fucken project question. I'm still confused, but whatever.