Jung Typology Test
01-20-2009, 12:36 PM
#31
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,155
Re: Jung Typology Test
Your Type is
INFJ
Introverted Intuitive Feeling Judging
Strength of the preferences %
78 25 12 67
INFJ type description by D.Keirsey
INFJ Identify Your Career with Jung Career Indicator™ INFJ Famous Personalities
INFJ type description by J. Butt and M.M. Heiss
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
very expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed feeling personality
distinctively expressed judging personality
INFJ
Introverted Intuitive Feeling Judging
Strength of the preferences %
78 25 12 67
INFJ type description by D.Keirsey
INFJ Identify Your Career with Jung Career Indicator™ INFJ Famous Personalities
INFJ type description by J. Butt and M.M. Heiss
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
very expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed feeling personality
distinctively expressed judging personality
01-20-2009, 02:01 PM
#32
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: Jung Typology Test
Originally Posted by Hitchhikkr
Basically I suck as a person. :P
On the other hand, a quick perusal of INTJforum displays some highly developed badasses who can do anything, say anything, think anything, be all things to all people and don't act like schmucks. The other 95% of the forum are obvious sociopaths and 30+ year old virgins. I don't know whether to be proud, or happy that I straddle the P/J border enough to get laid.
01-20-2009, 02:50 PM
#33
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 0
Re: Jung Typology Test
Extraverted Sensing Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
11 6 50 33
You are:
* slightly expressed extravert
* slightly expressed sensing personality
* moderately expressed thinking personality
* moderately expressed judging personality
Hmmmmm... the only other ESTJ on here is johnny, lol... I didn't expect that.
Strength of the preferences %
11 6 50 33
You are:
* slightly expressed extravert
* slightly expressed sensing personality
* moderately expressed thinking personality
* moderately expressed judging personality
Hmmmmm... the only other ESTJ on here is johnny, lol... I didn't expect that.
01-20-2009, 02:50 PM
#34
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Re: Jung Typology Test
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
You do understand that INTP are the most e-geeky and forum-friendly of all the types, but are the least practical, and as such your existence in car forums and in a real world occupation where you are required to produce is an anomaly?
Talk about irony.
I dont claim other INTP's as my people. I cant stand them honestly.
I sort of think I have more in common with an ISTP. Although I am horrible for starting things and never finishing them.
http://www.personalitypage.com/ISTP.html
01-20-2009, 04:26 PM
#35
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 44
Re: Jung Typology Test
Your Type is
INTJ
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
11 25 25 33
You are:
* slightly expressed introvert
* moderately expressed intuitive personality
* moderately expressed thinking personality
* moderately expressed judging personality
To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know.
INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.
INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.
In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know". Typical INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.
Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.
This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.
Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications.
INTJ
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
11 25 25 33
You are:
* slightly expressed introvert
* moderately expressed intuitive personality
* moderately expressed thinking personality
* moderately expressed judging personality
To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know.
INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.
INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.
In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know". Typical INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.
Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.
This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.
Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications.
01-20-2009, 04:41 PM
#37
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
01-20-2009, 05:24 PM
#38
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Re: Jung Typology Test
MBTI is bullshit.
The process of classifing people based on a test that shows how someone acts as opposed to how they think is just the biggest load of crap. Carl Jung stole his arch types from the Greek Elements, and neither Meyers nor Briggs (mother and daughter) had any formal education.
The whole stereo type doesnt bring into account external influences and enviroment. In which case, you lose predictability; and really whats the point of classifing people if their actions and thought processes are unpredictable?
The process of classifing people based on a test that shows how someone acts as opposed to how they think is just the biggest load of crap. Carl Jung stole his arch types from the Greek Elements, and neither Meyers nor Briggs (mother and daughter) had any formal education.
The whole stereo type doesnt bring into account external influences and enviroment. In which case, you lose predictability; and really whats the point of classifing people if their actions and thought processes are unpredictable?
