SkunT

kinda the way i think.

if we were to just pull all of the troops out, just like that, over say a 2 or 3 month time frame, wouldnt it be a little suspicous? or say, we retreat everything to kuwait, then nuke the ---- out of the country? Im sure people would catch on real quick. furthurmore, we have soo much money tied into new buildings we have built, air strips, we have all kinds of civilians working for us over there, it just cant work that way.

we have to continue to do what we are doing, and get them on there own 2 feet, then pull out. we went over there to get WMD, found nothing, did capture sadamm (which was the biggest weapon IMO) now we do need to move onto capturing osoma,yes, but we have all of this big fight going on, its not like they can just say, "peace, we are going to afgan, talk to you later" it just doesnt work that way. and to all of you who dont know, we pretty much did nuke afganastan. i have video proof if you would like to see, you will just have to come to NC and check it out. that place is leveled. we went over there, leveled that place and left. -we didnt have to worry about the terrosits ***** like we do in iraq. afgan and iraq are 2 different situations.

juli0_bustamante

i agree about the not voting and being a bitch part but how does it make sense to vote when it doesnt even count. I voted in california and it didnt ------- matter cause the other stupid states won becuase the majority of them were representing BUsh. ---- this voting ---- im done! it seems like it doesnt matted what "I" vote for.

oh yeah and the "popular v ote" and the "Electoral vote"

is a bunch of bullshit.....

Doofnoil

look, you gotta do something with all the taxpayer's money or else they'll start wondering where it's going. atleast now I can turn on the t.v. anytime I want, see something blow up, and think "yeah... who needs social security?"

prelude9384

I thought the percent that voted for Hitler was 33% or around there, I don't remember it being an overwhelming majority. But I could be wrong. The way Hitler got so powerful was that he used a certain law that pretty gave all authority to him after he was legally elected. Keep in mind this was from Germany's democratic constitution. Then short after the Riechstag(think that was the name), Germany's parliment building was abolished.

MikeJ-2009

Republicans can start a war every term and I'll still vote for them. The truth is that the two sides aren't really war vs. no war, it's really America vs. Socialism.
If you want to live in a country where the government is in control of your money, and then shells out every service you ever need, move to Canada.
If you want to work hard, keep your own money, and tell homeless people it's thier fault for being homeless, than vote republican.
Everyone wants to come here to work, because they know the oppertunities are endless if you apply yourself. People work hard, they succeed, and then the democrats start thinking of ways to tax the ---- out of you because you are successful, and give it to worthless *****.
Without the incentive of making it big, what motivation do we have? Socialism makes everyone equal, no matter how hard you work, so why work hard?

Reddy

Yeah I kinda did exaggerate, It was about 38%. They didn't have enough votes needed to change the constitution. Germany was a undergoing major changes during this time which was enabled him to become as powerful as he did.

And as for the Riechstag being abolished do you mean burned? The Riechstag was burned (most likely by Hitler's Waffen SS) it was deemed as a national tragedy. Hitler used this event and exploited it to pass a law to suspend the rights of citizens (not anything similar to the patriot act ). The quickly blamed it on the communists and eliminated his political opposition with it. Isn't it kinda erie how history repeats itself? Hitler used a tragedy like burning of the Riechstag to exploit his agenda just like how Bush uses 9/11 as an exuse for him to execute his agenda?

ToeJam

Please tell me you are kidding?!? Not only are people dying, but if they are lucky enough to live through the war there are physical and mental problems to deal with once they get home. It is taking their "life".
http://truthout.org/fyi/index.php?y=2005&m=1&d=13

Cray91

It sounds bad but this war's kill rate has nothing on the civil war, WWI, WWII, Veitnam, Korean or many other wars around the world. Americans simply cannot deal with loss of life as a biproduct of wars.

Donald125

IMO enough ppl get killed or not is not judged by "comparing".

it`s just that all these life got taken away is not ness.ry

Cray91

I don't think that people dying is good or anything. People just need to drop the "alarmist" mentality. Death is never good, but is a reality of war.