-FINALLY DYNOED, PRETTY HAPPY WITH IT- shitty track times inside
#52
Re: -FINALLY DYNOED, PRETTY HAPPY WITH IT- shitty dyno graph inside
AFRs are only inferred by exhaust oxygen content - in no way shape or form are they actually measured. The only way to observe what is going on in the chamber is to look at the chamber and the plug. It's what I'd go off of.
I've had idiots argue with me about that over the years, Doug @ Hyundaidata is a big anti-plug reading mouthpiece. Look at any "3000" whp Outlaw car, you can't dyno that ----. You take it to the track and look at timeslips and plugs.
I've had idiots argue with me about that over the years, Doug @ Hyundaidata is a big anti-plug reading mouthpiece. Look at any "3000" whp Outlaw car, you can't dyno that ----. You take it to the track and look at timeslips and plugs.
#53
Re: -FINALLY DYNOED, PRETTY HAPPY WITH IT- shitty dyno graph inside
There's only so much that the resistance of the passing fluid could tell you isn't there?
Not to mention it's the average assessed by the sensor, that would give you some kind of inherent sensor error.
Not to mention it's the average assessed by the sensor, that would give you some kind of inherent sensor error.
#55
Re: -FINALLY DYNOED, PRETTY HAPPY WITH IT-
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Unless you are approaching knock limit, pumpgas timing is more or less Torco 110 timing is more or less c16 timing. It's pretty fixed for iso-octane based fuels.
bigfig, I disagree with your argument regarding timing. I run stock cam D16 in the 300 whp range richer than anyone else I know, but I haven't lost any of them. Power actually comes up on them as you beat on the car, even though the coolant temps remain static; the real chamber temp can't be tuned for. Running 12:1 at 300-350 on a stock cam D16, or even mid 11's, yeah, you might get it to run better by backing off timing like you describe. But. I wouldn't do it that way.
The 305 whp @ 12 psi Z6 that CSaddict made the manifold for, I ran that at 12:1 and IIRC it was single digit timing. I'll post screenshots when I get home if anyone is curious.
bigfig, I disagree with your argument regarding timing. I run stock cam D16 in the 300 whp range richer than anyone else I know, but I haven't lost any of them. Power actually comes up on them as you beat on the car, even though the coolant temps remain static; the real chamber temp can't be tuned for. Running 12:1 at 300-350 on a stock cam D16, or even mid 11's, yeah, you might get it to run better by backing off timing like you describe. But. I wouldn't do it that way.
The 305 whp @ 12 psi Z6 that CSaddict made the manifold for, I ran that at 12:1 and IIRC it was single digit timing. I'll post screenshots when I get home if anyone is curious.
As for E85, your numbers are way off as far as fuel consumption. Figure an average of 30% more fuel with E85 vs gasoline. Most people are actually tuning E85 leaner than they "should" as per E85's suggested best AFRs.
Last question, have you made the cam gear changes and done a before and after at the track? http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1875921&page=1
#57
Re: -FINALLY DYNOED, PRETTY HAPPY WITH IT- shitty track times inside
i made it to the track on sunday and was pretty dissapointed. my first time on slicks and i had some pretty abused 24" slicks. was on low boost trying to get it dialed in. first time on the line i realize i still have my 2step for street tires and it holds at 3500 rpm. ------- gay, i could barly even spin in the water box. with the full throttle launch at 3500 it would just fall on its face off the line. my best 60' with the slicks was around a 2.8 and i went 13.5 at 104. i did like 6 pulls like that and said ---- it and tried for trap speeds .
it wasnt getting any better, put my street tires on and did one more pass and actually had my fastest pass. went 13.4 at 117
wasnt the cleanest pass ive ever made and i tripped the finish lights spinning in third on those street tires. so i went for another pass and popped an intercooler pipe, said ---- it and went home.
it wasnt getting any better, put my street tires on and did one more pass and actually had my fastest pass. went 13.4 at 117
wasnt the cleanest pass ive ever made and i tripped the finish lights spinning in third on those street tires. so i went for another pass and popped an intercooler pipe, said ---- it and went home.
#58
Re: -FINALLY DYNOED, PRETTY HAPPY WITH IT-
Originally Posted by bigwig
You run your car rich and leave the timing advanced?
Originally Posted by bigwig
Since fuel really doesn't cool combustion temps(all that much)
Originally Posted by bigwig
all you are doing by running rich is wasting fuel so that you can have combustion take a longer time. What works works, but richer+more timing is more or less the same as leaner + less timing.
Originally Posted by bigwig
for E85, your numbers are way off as far as fuel consumption. Figure an average of 30% more fuel with E85 vs gasoline.
Originally Posted by bigwig
Last question, have you made the cam gear changes and done a before and after at the track? http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1875921&page=1
I don't have time or interest to read a bullshit HT thread further than the first five posts, but for a stock cam turbo B-series I never touch the cam gears either. For a stock cam D16 I always touch the gear, in fact I insist on it. D-series are not B-series and tech from one engine does not transfer to the other. Anything with aftermarket cams needs the gears played with.
vtecduck's D16Z6 only had "light cleanup" passes made to the head and deck, which resulted in his stock cam timing being 3.x degrees off. That's a half tooth off, if you think that isn't a substantial amount that has an affect on powerband, trap speed, dynamic cooling temps, etc, then you are mistaken. ALL D16 have these issues. By comparison B-series engines like the BRMS car, or Goforth's CRX, which have been apart several times and decked/milled more than once end up in the range of 0.5-0.75 degrees off. I know these figures off the top of my head because I have a Mike Belben cam degree fixture (since waaaaay before Skunk picked one up) and I ------- degree everything I touch, whereby I acquire a working knowledge of how things and how much things are affected by mechanical timing changes. You don't. You read some forum posts and throw them in my face.
As far as track times, I've only babysay one at the track. Blossfield's 93 Si with speaker box and every option runs consistent 7.6-7.7 at Shadyside Dragway, has three years, and does so at the 300 whp level. He has cheap Goldline drop springs, no traction bars, and 23" slicks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Threads
General Discussion
12
10-11-2005 01:32 PM