|
Domestic guys
First production year of the mustang was 1964, released in April right? called a "1964 1/2" ? This kid's trying to tell me he's buying a 1963 1/2... doesnt sound right.
|
Re: Domestic guys
62 and 63 stang's were prototypes, production began in in 1964, first off the Dearbon line on March 9th, 1964..........
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/121.shtml http://www.mocsem.com/6465.asp |
Re: Domestic guys
For purposes of clarity, it is useful to note that Ford never referred to Mustangs as "'64" or "'64 1/2" models. These designations are the work of collectors who seek to differentiate an early '65 from a late '65. That said, Ford made midstream changes throughout the model year. The 289 cid V8 replaces the 260; the driver's seat becomes adjustable; an alternator replaces the direct-current generator; spare tire brackets are revised and more. |
Re: Domestic guys
64 1/2 is the common term for them. they are ugly ugly mustangs....
|
Re: Domestic guys
This kid's trying to tell me that he's buying a 1963 1/2 Mustang "prototype" for $1200. Thats what I'm not believing. lol but thanks guys.
|
Re: Domestic guys
well, you have 2 choices.........
try to school him and prevent the buy...........or sit back and laugh.......... You a TRUE car nut? Must protect the innocent and stupid (in your view)...... |
Re: Domestic guys
have him take pictures to see this beast ::) ::) ::)
64-1/2 mustangs, well early 65's are the worst, they where made quickly to get them out to the market and there's a lot of little differences, updates and upgrades you will find in the late 65 and 66 models. They are valuable to some point because of the whole year one mentallity. But came with weaker engines and ugly interiors. but 63-1/2 concept, I don't think so, nevertheless, if it is not a rust bucket it is a steal for $1200. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands