General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

CRX turbo vs NSX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2006, 09:32 AM
  #61  
0.0 BAR
 
HondaTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Did you REALLY need to bring this back?
HondaTuner is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 03:12 PM
  #62  
0.5 BAR
 
G13BT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 72
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

No... not really...

I found it by chance... pitty i dindīt find it sooner...

Really sorry bringing this back, but iīm human, and i couldnīt resist...

Hereīs a nice video of a smart beating the hell out of a ferrari, from the same country as the NSX vs CRX video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pxs-...tugal%20racing
G13BT is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 03:53 PM
  #63  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

f430 are slow.

lets go find a 6 second bug and show it beating a stock ferrari and say yeap bugs must be the greatest cars in the world
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 03:55 PM
  #64  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Originally Posted by G13BT
japs are dumb, the base model vette (which they are comparing) smashes all of those cars in any form of racing.

blantently biased and jealous gooks whose ancestors were in a million degree blast
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 04:02 PM
  #65  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

boxter s - garbage high 13 second overpriced pos
elise - too slow to compete
z4 - garbage, too slow, weights a ton, all around overpriced pos
rx7 - too slow to compete
s2k - obviously way too slow to compete

stock base model c6 vette is at least two full seconds faster than all those cars in the 1/4, and handles just as well as all of them.

verdict vette wins around any course (except a go kart track... aka autocross aka slow car racing)

J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 04:17 PM
  #66  
1.0 BAR
 
InfernoSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 479
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

1999 GTR-R34 Skyline owns the world.



Oh yeah!



P.S. Oh yeah forgot to put IMO.
InfernoSoul is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 04:24 PM
  #67  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

yeap, 14+ second $90,000 280hp no torque pigs own the world. awesome

1984 crossfire corvettes out perform skylines lol

280hp, 216tq 3700lbs. wow that sounds like a runner

svt cobra 380/380 3600lbs
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 04:28 PM
  #68  
0.5 BAR
 
G13BT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 72
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Originally Posted by random-strike
yeap, high 13 second $90,000 280hp no torque pigs own the world. awesome

1984 crossfire corvettes out perform skylines lol
Man... ... 3 consecutive posts, almost 4... man your mad... and your proud too... i really pushed your buttons...

At least iīm pretty far away...

And you measure how good a car is by itīs 1/4mile time?? Thatīs smart....
G13BT is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 04:40 PM
  #69  
1.0 BAR
 
InfernoSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 479
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

I thought that skyline ran a high 13's? Well I looked up your "Awesome fantastic super uber bad *** domestic" and it only runs mid 15's stock: http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/...84/84perf.html <---- Now I am not positive if that it so I am sure you will correct me if I am wrong. What that thing is a 5.7L and the skyline is a 2.6L and what does the vette weigh 3400lbs? I'd rather have an AWD then a RWD. I would bet the skyline handles way better then that vette.

EDIT: Oh and I just looked up the weight of that skyline on this site:http://www.skylinegtr.com/SPECS.html that got specs from motorex says it is only 3388lbs. Meh who knows.
InfernoSoul is offline  
Old 06-22-2006, 04:45 PM
  #70  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX turbo vs NSX

Originally Posted by InfernoSoul
I thought that skyline ran a high 13's? Well I looked up your "Awesome fantastic super uber bad *** domestic" and it only runs mid 15's stock: http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/...84/84perf.html <---- Now I am not positive if that it so I am sure you will correct me if I am wrong. What that thing is a 5.7L and the skyline is a 2.6L and what does the vette weigh 3400lbs? I'd rather have an AWD then a RWD. I would bet the skyline handles way better then that vette.
the skyline doesnt come close to handling as good as that vette, even those that year is one of the worst years for corvettes. will the gutless smog motors.

the 1984 vette pulls over a g on the skippad. and they brake good also, they are pigs though... slow slow slow.
J-SMITH69 is offline  


Quick Reply: CRX turbo vs NSX



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.