Re: CRX turbo vs NSX
Did you REALLY need to bring this back?
|
Re: CRX turbo vs NSX
No... not really...
I found it by chance... pitty i dindīt find it sooner... Really sorry bringing this back, but iīm human, and i couldnīt resist... Hereīs a nice video of a smart beating the hell out of a ferrari, from the same country as the NSX vs CRX video... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pxs-...tugal%20racing |
Re: CRX turbo vs NSX
f430 are slow.
lets go find a 6 second bug and show it beating a stock ferrari and say yeap bugs must be the greatest cars in the world |
Re: CRX turbo vs NSX
blantently biased and jealous gooks whose ancestors were in a million degree blast |
Re: CRX turbo vs NSX
boxter s - garbage high 13 second overpriced pos
elise - too slow to compete z4 - garbage, too slow, weights a ton, all around overpriced pos rx7 - too slow to compete s2k - obviously way too slow to compete stock base model c6 vette is at least two full seconds faster than all those cars in the 1/4, and handles just as well as all of them. verdict vette wins around any course (except a go kart track... aka autocross aka slow car racing) |
Re: CRX turbo vs NSX
1999 GTR-R34 Skyline owns the world.
http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/05/gtrr34_07.jpg Oh yeah! 8) P.S. Oh yeah forgot to put IMO. |
Re: CRX turbo vs NSX
yeap, 14+ second $90,000 280hp no torque pigs own the world. awesome :)
1984 crossfire corvettes out perform skylines lol 280hp, 216tq 3700lbs. wow that sounds like a runner svt cobra 380/380 3600lbs :) |
Re: CRX turbo vs NSX
Originally Posted by random-strike
yeap, high 13 second $90,000 280hp no torque pigs own the world. awesome :)
1984 crossfire corvettes out perform skylines lol At least iīm pretty far away... And you measure how good a car is by itīs 1/4mile time????? Thatīs smart.... ::) |
Re: CRX turbo vs NSX
I thought that skyline ran a high 13's? Well I looked up your "Awesome fantastic super uber bad ass domestic" and it only runs mid 15's stock: http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/...84/84perf.html <---- Now I am not positive if that it so I am sure you will correct me if I am wrong. What that thing is a 5.7L and the skyline is a 2.6L and what does the vette weigh 3400lbs? I'd rather have an AWD then a RWD. I would bet the skyline handles way better then that vette.
EDIT: Oh and I just looked up the weight of that skyline on this site:http://www.skylinegtr.com/SPECS.html that got specs from motorex says it is only 3388lbs. Meh who knows. |
Re: CRX turbo vs NSX
Originally Posted by InfernoSoul
I thought that skyline ran a high 13's? Well I looked up your "Awesome fantastic super uber bad ass domestic" and it only runs mid 15's stock: http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/...84/84perf.html <---- Now I am not positive if that it so I am sure you will correct me if I am wrong. What that thing is a 5.7L and the skyline is a 2.6L and what does the vette weigh 3400lbs? I'd rather have an AWD then a RWD. I would bet the skyline handles way better then that vette.
the 1984 vette pulls over a g on the skippad. and they brake good also, they are pigs though... slow slow slow. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands