General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

Automatic???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 12:47 AM
  #1  
racer562's Avatar
Thread Starter
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
Default Automatic???

Do you think its worth it turbo charging an automatic car?
Civic 96 DX hatch
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 12:50 AM
  #2  
Reddy's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:Automatic???

Yeah you can, its just that automatics are so gay and boring. I would swap in a manual just so the car would be a little bit of fun
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 12:52 AM
  #3  
racer562's Avatar
Thread Starter
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re:Automatic???

Would it be as fast as a turbo charged manual car?
I dont think so..whats your opinion?
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 12:55 AM
  #4  
Reddy's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:Automatic???

Originally Posted by racer562
Would it be as fast as a turbo charged manual car?
I dont think so..whats your opinion?

No, auto trans rob massive power and plus they are for gay people.
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 01:00 AM
  #5  
MakAttack's Avatar
3.0 BAR
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,687
Default Re:Automatic???

autos don't normally have as much torque, or acceleration power. with a manual you get to decide how long you stay in each gear and usually have more power at the start of each gear. you have the choice to drop into a lower gear to pull on someone too. manual would definitely be much more fun. imo, for what it's worth *shrug*

btw johnny is so fine. i just wanna.... uuuuaaaa yeeeeeaaaah baby
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 01:04 AM
  #6  
J-SMITH69's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:Automatic???

mary is exactly right!
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 08:01 AM
  #7  
sohcrxsi's Avatar
1.5 BAR
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,330
Default Re:Automatic???

i think a turbo auto honda would be fun for like 10 minuntes, then it would be gay.
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 08:16 AM
  #8  
Wally's Avatar
1.0 BAR
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 251
Default Re:Automatic???

The little shifter thing between the seats, it does have a 1 and a 2 in addition to the R, N & D. Use 'em!
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 12:22 PM
  #9  
Special FX's Avatar
1.0 BAR
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 368
Default Re:Automatic???

I guess although it might be unpopular to say, I think it would be ------- rad.
1. Autos DO have more wheel torque off the line, the problem is that you make tons of torque and only like 5 horsepower. The real downfall is not being able to control launch rpm as well.
2. Despite the torque converter robbing your hp's, you can spool up before launch. Case in point- 12 second Dodge Diesels are leaving the line near full boost.
3. My favorite argument (especially for huge turbos) is the theory of no blowoff required. Just mash and go and it will shift incredibly fast, accurately, consistently, and you stay spooled. Probably good enough to make up for some of the other power lost. Kinda easier on axles, too, although not as easy to show off and ---- around.
4. Newer autos have more gears which will definitely allow for better performance and ideal ratios than the 3 speed slushboxes we are used to.

I really do believe all of this, I think for straight line racing with turbos, a well set-up auto trans could do at least as well as a good driver in a manual.
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 01:13 PM
  #10  
MakAttack's Avatar
3.0 BAR
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,687
Default Re:Automatic???

I find that people in autos at the strips usually have more consistant run times too. *shrug* Not a whole lot of room for error like there is in a manual.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM.