Re: The Audi A3 sucked balls so....(yes, pictures)
Originally Posted by buk9tp
i think its gay that lexus got rid of the is300
http://www.lexus.com/fcv/is_f.html The exhaust positioning looks kinda weird... |
Re: The Audi A3 sucked balls so....(yes, pictures)
i dont know who made that style 1st, lexus or bmw, but they look the same
things pimp. |
Re: The Audi A3 sucked balls so....(yes, pictures)
i do agree on thwe styling being like a bmw or vise versa but it's a sweet car and i would drive both kinds
|
Re: The Audi A3 sucked balls so....(yes, pictures)
Originally Posted by random-strike
should've got a CTS-V :P
Car really isn't all that. Put a couple thousand miles on one last summer. The gear box feels like complete ----. The interior is mostly plastic and cheap looking. The buttons on the nav/radio started pealing after 10000 miles. It kinda feels like a slob too. It can handle but it's deceiving, doesn't feel like it can. The stock runflats suck cock too. Oh yeah and it was in for service probably more than raffis audi was. I gotta say though the driving position was almost spot on, the dash looked absolutely gorgeous at night and the exhaust note was butter. I def wouldn't spend the 50gs new on that thing but now they're kinda reasonable. I think the ------ thing got like 8-12 miles to the gallon the way i drove though.... For an american car, every girl that i let drive it...i at least got head from before i dropped her off. It's really sad that this is the main thing i look for in a car. "How much ass can i get in this thing?" |
Re: The Audi A3 sucked balls so....(yes, pictures)
yea ok...
you still can't even compare these other cars to it performance wise. the CTS-V has the same transmission (T56) as the svt cobra mustang, ls1 camaro/firebird, corvettes, vipers, etc... one of the best transmissions ever made. never seen a CTS-V at 50k even new. ocasically i see a older woman driving a black one with black wheels. its amazing looking |
Re: The Audi A3 sucked balls so....(yes, pictures)
I'm not talking just performance wise - total package. ---- i had more fun driving a homo red Z4 3.0 to be honest with you.
I meant shifter. It needs bushings or a short shift kit. As is, its a pain in the ass. I'd still roll it though. back on topic--- Did you lease or buy the is? |
Re: The Audi A3 sucked balls so....(yes, pictures)
Originally Posted by yayopwrcrx
I'm not talking just performance wise - total package. ---- i had more fun driving a homo red Z4 3.0 to be honest with you.
I meant shifter. It needs bushings or a short shift kit. As is, its a pain in the ass. I'd still roll it though. back on topic--- Did you lease or buy the is? |
Re: The Audi A3 sucked balls so....(yes, pictures)
I'd probably trade my penis for a CTS-V, even after hearing all that negative crap. if I won the lottery, I would be driving a CTS-V daily.
__________________ Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote |
Re: The Audi A3 sucked balls so....(yes, pictures)
CTSs are verry nice looking cars. By far the best body styling out there. The problem is that GM uses the same grade "pleather" in all their vehicles. I couldnt belive how fake the leather looked and felt. My friend who just spent 35k for a new tahoe pay to have that ---- added and I laughed when I saw it. He asked "what" and I just played it off ::) .The insde did not inpress me at all eather.
At least the "leather" in the IS feels soft and has a grain finish to it that doesnt look like a 1980 fake Michale Jackson zipper jacket. |
Re: The Audi A3 sucked balls so....(yes, pictures)
Originally Posted by d16forlife
1980 fake Michale Jackson zipper jacket.
i thoguht that was cool |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands