General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

ADVANCED VTEC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2009, 08:11 PM
  #11  
3.0 BAR
 
Scott-EP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Augustine FL
Posts: 3,936
Default Re: ADVANCED VTEC

it looks like it still has a cam chain so now im lost. i was thinking the same thing with actuated valves. maybe electronically adjustable lifters?
Scott-EP is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 08:12 PM
  #12  
0.0 BAR
 
bitchM0VE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 0
Default Re: ADVANCED VTEC

BMW did a fully electronically controlled valve engine a few years ago. ECU had full control of every valve.
bitchM0VE is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 08:15 PM
  #13  
3.0 BAR
 
Hitchhikkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Default Re: ADVANCED VTEC

Originally Posted by Jorsher
Robb - it said 3 years from then is when they'll try to have it in cars, which would mean sometime in 2009 (this year)

Despite the expected jokes about a vtec, continuously variable valve timing sounds sweet. Any idea how this advanced technology works, JD? Electronically actuated? Could be the end of cams...
I was being sarcastic. Im not buying any honda made after 99' :P

Buick invented continuously variable valve timing in the late 1920's. No new technology here, just a practical application.
Hitchhikkr is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 08:19 PM
  #14  
3.0 BAR
 
Jorsher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,322
Default Re: ADVANCED VTEC

Originally Posted by Robb
I was being sarcastic. Im not buying any honda made after 99' :P

Buick invented continuously variable valve timing in the late 1920's. No new technology here, just a practical application.
Yeah, but I'm betting Honda's variation is a different technology than what Buick used in the 20s.

Obviously there were issues with it, or it was too complex, or else it would be used by every manufacturer today, like vtec-ish tech that's used by everyone.

I feel you on the "no new honda after 99" thing, although if they do the new CRX right, I may get one.
Jorsher is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 08:40 PM
  #15  
3.0 BAR
 
Hitchhikkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Default Re: ADVANCED VTEC

Back "in the day" we didnt give a flying ---- about emissions or gas mileage, hince why no one bothered with it.

Vtec is just a good idle. Nothing more.
Hitchhikkr is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 08:58 PM
  #16  
3.0 BAR
 
Jorsher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,322
Default Re: ADVANCED VTEC

Yah, a single cam profile is efficient for the whole 8000-9000 rpm. Waste of time.
Jorsher is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 09:05 PM
  #17  
3.0 BAR
 
Hitchhikkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Default Re: ADVANCED VTEC

Originally Posted by Jorsher
Yah, a single cam profile is efficient for the whole 8000-9000 rpm. Waste of time.
Yeah never mind about airflow disruption during the switchover.

Last time I checked, you still spec your cams for the powerband/gearing you want to run.

For me at least, it is a waste of time.
Hitchhikkr is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 09:08 PM
  #18  
3.0 BAR
 
Jorsher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,322
Default Re: ADVANCED VTEC

Originally Posted by Robb
Yeah never mind about airflow disruption during the switchover.

Last time I checked, you still spec your cams for the powerband/gearing you want to run.

For me at least, it is a waste of time.
Airflow disruption for a fraction of a second?

I get what you're saying, that you'll spec the cams for a specific RPM range that you'll be "performing" in, but multiple valve durations is still more efficient than one...
Jorsher is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 09:41 PM
  #19  
3.0 BAR
 
Hitchhikkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Default Re: ADVANCED VTEC

Originally Posted by Jorsher
Airflow disruption for a fraction of a second?

I get what you're saying, that you'll spec the cams for a specific RPM range that you'll be "performing" in, but multiple valve durations is still more efficient than one...
Sure, its probably more efficient, but therein lies the problem for people like you and I. The more complex they make the system, the more the design lends itself to be unforgiving in a situation where the airflow is increased above and beyond what the engine was ever intended for. Yes, this is true to an extent with any car, but the rules havent changed when making power. Still gotta cram as much air and fuel in there as possible. Everything is a compromise, some are greater than others. 'New' tech is always fun to learn about, but there will always be compromises that must be overcome. Will this AVTEC be a compromise for design in the long run? Guess we'll see.
Hitchhikkr is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 11:55 PM
  #20  
0.0 BAR
 
Smith-02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 0
Default Re: ADVANCED VTEC

the amount of drag and friction all the extra ---- and cams and blah blah, single cams still rule the mpg
Smith-02 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Paul99EX
Turbo Parts For Sale
0
01-03-2006 09:46 AM
irocz
Engine Management
5
09-03-2005 07:16 PM
83Rabbit
Engine Management
2
08-28-2003 06:43 PM
superpilun
Forced Induction
2
03-25-2003 10:17 AM
Kaneda13
General Discussion
33
03-05-2003 02:20 AM



Quick Reply: ADVANCED VTEC



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.