950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
01-18-2007, 12:26 PM
#31
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 0
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Originally Posted by dtrain
im sorry. evidently honda thought the 3.2l motor was trash and decided to go to the 3.0l motor with less power. this is just one more excuse for you being retarded. just admit it
see. all you are seeing is that a small displacement car beat a slightly larger displacement car. therefore your dumbass is attempting to put 2 and 2 together....unfortunatly your coming up with 3 instead of 4. what im saying is that you seeing 1.6l beat 3.xl (depending on what year M3 it is), and you think, "hey that civic won cause he had more power per liter!" wrong. the civic ways a ---- ton less than the m3. thats called POWER TO WEIGHT RATIO. thats what wins races.
and when it comes to power/weight between say the 2002 nsx with the SAME 3.2l at 290hp. the weight is at 3153 which equals out to 10.8 hp/pound...not bad
and how does the bmw e46 M3 stack up to it. lets see..again the 3.2l BMW motor has 333hp. the weight is at 3415 which equals out to 10.2 hp/pound....YOU LOSE AGAIN
see. all you are seeing is that a small displacement car beat a slightly larger displacement car. therefore your dumbass is attempting to put 2 and 2 together....unfortunatly your coming up with 3 instead of 4. what im saying is that you seeing 1.6l beat 3.xl (depending on what year M3 it is), and you think, "hey that civic won cause he had more power per liter!" wrong. the civic ways a ---- ton less than the m3. thats called POWER TO WEIGHT RATIO. thats what wins races.
and when it comes to power/weight between say the 2002 nsx with the SAME 3.2l at 290hp. the weight is at 3153 which equals out to 10.8 hp/pound...not bad
and how does the bmw e46 M3 stack up to it. lets see..again the 3.2l BMW motor has 333hp. the weight is at 3415 which equals out to 10.2 hp/pound....YOU LOSE AGAIN
01-18-2007, 12:29 PM
#32
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 0
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Originally Posted by mycrx
01-18-2007, 12:40 PM
#33
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 0
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Originally Posted by mycrx
next
01-18-2007, 12:44 PM
#34
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,790
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
how the ***** a built race motor a stock d or b with a turbo kit, wow a sc61 on 9psi blow me, leeds crx stock would own this and look at pats d :1 just ------ sick, that bimmer doesnt have ---- on a total of about a 5k car 
4 cylinders at that, ---- my friends e30 dinan prob wouldnt even beat it, its very fun to drive and it handles good but nothing like a b16 turbo jus ------- waaaaaaaaa baaa baaaaaaa buurrrrr waaaaa baaaa baaaa, and its on9 psi its also hella "clean" looking and would prob handle a wreck better then any honda :1 e30 m3's own, i have some pics from some on a spokane drive if u ------s like that ----, and yes it was a bmw drive and i went haha 
* Custom tuned Dinan Turbo
* 9-10Psi
* Ported and polished head
* 3" Custom downpipe
* 3" full cat-less exhaust system
* Dinan E36 M3 Exhaust Custom Fitted
4 cylinders at that, ---- my friends e30 dinan prob wouldnt even beat it, its very fun to drive and it handles good but nothing like a b16 turbo jus ------- waaaaaaaaa baaa baaaaaaa buurrrrr waaaaa baaaa baaaa, and its on9 psi its also hella "clean" looking and would prob handle a wreck better then any honda :1 e30 m3's own, i have some pics from some on a spokane drive if u ------s like that ----, and yes it was a bmw drive and i went haha * Custom tuned Dinan Turbo
* 9-10Psi
* Ported and polished head
* 3" Custom downpipe
* 3" full cat-less exhaust system
* Dinan E36 M3 Exhaust Custom Fitted
01-18-2007, 01:03 PM
#35
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,036
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
if you actually compare car for car litre per litre the nsx in 97 was better than a m3, of course if you compare a 97 to a 06 (9 yearsnewer) obviously the bmw will look better but , if you compare a 01 nsx
2001 Acura NSX V6 4.5 12.9 (C&D TV 2001)
2002 BMW M3 4.7 13.4
hrmm 12.9 1/4 mile for the nsx
and a 13.4 for the m3
price for power, ---- bliing bling ****** ---- 01 nsx > 02 m3 not only is it faster, it does look better and it handles better
2001 Acura NSX V6 4.5 12.9 (C&D TV 2001)
2002 BMW M3 4.7 13.4
hrmm 12.9 1/4 mile for the nsx
and a 13.4 for the m3
price for power, ---- bliing bling ****** ---- 01 nsx > 02 m3 not only is it faster, it does look better and it handles better
01-19-2007, 12:13 PM
#37
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 0
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Originally Posted by ososlohatch
if you actually compare car for car litre per litre the nsx in 97 was better than a m3, of course if you compare a 97 to a 06 (9 yearsnewer) obviously the bmw will look better but , if you compare a 01 nsx
2001 Acura NSX V6 4.5 12.9 (C&D TV 2001)
2002 BMW M3 4.7 13.4
hrmm 12.9 1/4 mile for the nsx
and a 13.4 for the m3
price for power, ---- bliing bling ****** ---- 01 nsx > 02 m3 not only is it faster, it does look better and it handles better
2001 Acura NSX V6 4.5 12.9 (C&D TV 2001)
2002 BMW M3 4.7 13.4
hrmm 12.9 1/4 mile for the nsx
and a 13.4 for the m3
price for power, ---- bliing bling ****** ---- 01 nsx > 02 m3 not only is it faster, it does look better and it handles better
01-19-2007, 01:11 PM
#38
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,790
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
considering the nsx engine was the first in the us and hasnt been changed much since ------- 91, id say i hope a 06 bmw engine would be better, as for my friends 97 m3 the nsx would own it, it is not fast at all, im guessing mid 14's maybe it is the 3.2l im comparing everything too because i havent ridden in a newer m3 let alone care too, nsx owns that kraut ---- anyway, keep to your opinion and ill keep to mine, HONDA ENGINEERING FTW!
01-19-2007, 02:55 PM
#40
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,808
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Nice video. On the honda engineering ftw, their street car stuff is decent, but in the high end technology powertrain/drivetrain wise, they are way behind, even in the NSX stuff. Don't really see Honda's competing too well in the higher level motorsports. And if you think Honda has motor technology superior to BMW, then why can the S54 motor take boost at 11.5:1 CR and the Type R motors have major issues with anything over 10psi on a half decent turbo? Honda's fuel system technology is years behind BMW's.
