General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

the 05 mustang...

Old 10-05-2004, 09:47 PM
  #21  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:the 05 mustang...

Originally Posted by PHiZ
Originally Posted by random-strike
i hate explaining this ---- to everyone so i'll do it once...
-PHiZ


J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 10-05-2004, 09:48 PM
  #22  
3.0 BAR
 
kain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,448
Default Re:the 05 mustang...

i seem to agree with randome.

kain is offline  
Old 10-05-2004, 10:54 PM
  #23  
1.0 BAR
 
Cadracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 366
Default Re:the 05 mustang...

revs = wear
I love torque thats why i like the cadillac motors.
525 ftlbs at 2800 rpm 325 hp an this is stock components.Gonna throw twin ct26 supra turbos at it in place of the trailer park 283.I think thats whats its gonna have to take to keep up with jeff an leigh an gun for beau. LOL
Cadracer is offline  
Old 10-05-2004, 11:08 PM
  #24  
0.0 BAR
 
MikeJ-2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:the 05 mustang...

I think you meant to say that displacement = torque, not revs.
MikeJ-2009 is offline  
Old 10-05-2004, 11:16 PM
  #25  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:the 05 mustang...

Originally Posted by Stealthmode
I think you meant to say that displacement = torque, not revs.
if you're talkin to me i meant what i said...

this is what is boils down to, and there are many factors which make this happen, head(s), cam(s), IM, exhaust ext...

revs = horsepower
low revs = torque

if you're building a motor for torque, it won't make power way up high obviously, so there is no reason to be there...

if you're building a motor for horsepower, it won't make torque down below, so there is no reason to be there...

example.

b18b
b18c

same displacement, vtec complicates it a lot, but you get my drift... if the b18c didnt have vtec just agressive cams for way up high in the revs it would make less torque and the same horsepower, while the b18b would make more torque and less horsepower than the b18c.

vtec lets the b18c keep the torque and still create horsepower at high revs with the other cam lobes... that is what its for :P
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 10-05-2004, 11:47 PM
  #26  
0.0 BAR
 
MikeJ-2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:the 05 mustang...

I think the torque your refering to is based more on the fact that it's larger displacement. If you want to build a torque motor, you build with large displacement. :P
MikeJ-2009 is offline  
Old 10-05-2004, 11:49 PM
  #27  
0.0 BAR
 
smithSHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 25
Default Re:the 05 mustang...

Pushrod motors tend to lend themselves to low rpm - high torque output due to the long valvetrain, thats why most V8s see more low end than top end. The higher revving DOHC cars like yours and mine have a much shorter valve train lending it better to high rpm operation. Obviously a typical pushrod v8 can be built like any motor to make high end HP, but for the most part they stay in the low end. Its hard to make a 1.6L engine torquey so the key is to make it rev out, hold the torque, and built HP.
smithSHO is offline  
Old 10-06-2004, 12:44 AM
  #29  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:the 05 mustang...

Originally Posted by Scottsi

haha nice.
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 10-06-2004, 12:47 AM
  #30  
3.0 BAR
 
Donald125's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 6,279
Default Re:the 05 mustang...

one thing i don`t understand about push rod motor is, WHY and WHAT makes it produce THAT MUCH more low end tork.
i am not talking about displacement tho

Donald125 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: the 05 mustang...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 PM.