Topic: Jackson Racing Superchargers
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Topic: Jackson Racing Superchargers
ok, i'm debating on whether to go w/ the turbo setup.. or spend a little more for jackson racing's very own patented supercharger for my 88 crx dx. Does anyone here know which setup i'd be better off with in the long run.. i'm wanting a daily driver that can run some well respected numbers at the track.
#3
Re:Topic: Jackson Racing Superchargers
turbo>s/c
Turbos don't take power to make power. It uses exhaust gas thats going to be wasted anyways where s/c need to run off a pully/belt. Turbos easier to upgrade and can make more power for less money.
Turbos don't take power to make power. It uses exhaust gas thats going to be wasted anyways where s/c need to run off a pully/belt. Turbos easier to upgrade and can make more power for less money.
#5
Re:Topic: Jackson Racing Superchargers
ahh but turbos DO make more power, they are more efficient, and most blowers only produce peak boost at or near redline, where turbos will produce peak boost often throughout a wide powerband. Plus many centrifugal blowers (like a vortech) wont produce boost right off idle as well as youd think it would.
#6
Re:Topic: Jackson Racing Superchargers
Turbo - Cheaper, more hp, doesnt take power to make power
SC - No lag, easy application
I actually almost got a JRSC for $300, I wish I would've bought it. If you find it cheap then do it, power is power.
SC - No lag, easy application
I actually almost got a JRSC for $300, I wish I would've bought it. If you find it cheap then do it, power is power.
#7
Re:Topic: Jackson Racing Superchargers
Originally Posted by accordepicenter
ahh but turbos DO make more power, they are more efficient, and most blowers only produce peak boost at or near redline, where turbos will produce peak boost often throughout a wide powerband. Plus many centrifugal blowers (like a vortech) wont produce boost right off idle as well as youd think it would.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toyosupr
Turbo Parts For Sale
2
11-15-2003 05:30 PM