Some problems with new setup
09-12-2007, 01:38 PM
#32
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 0
Re: Some problems with new setup
Originally Posted by QikEnuF
Nelson Racing Engines made well over 1100chp on HRM's Project F-Bomb on 91 Octane.. Then threw race gas and made about 1500chp.
http://www.hotrod.com/projectbuild/h...ild/index.html Basics
http://www.hotrod.com/projectbuild/h...bocharger.html Dyno Sheet towards bottom
All under 6000rpm and with a 700rpm idle and at 1 bar of boost. By that 1psi=10chp, that would either mean the motor makes 860ish chp N/A, which it does not, or it is running an ***-ton of boost, which it is not since it was only running 1 bar of boost. That a good enough example?
I think I win?
http://www.hotrod.com/projectbuild/h...ild/index.html Basics
http://www.hotrod.com/projectbuild/h...bocharger.html Dyno Sheet towards bottom
All under 6000rpm and with a 700rpm idle and at 1 bar of boost. By that 1psi=10chp, that would either mean the motor makes 860ish chp N/A, which it does not, or it is running an ***-ton of boost, which it is not since it was only running 1 bar of boost. That a good enough example?
I think I win?
they made 1165chp on 110oct race fuel
09-12-2007, 02:46 PM
#33
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,808
Re: Some problems with new setup
Originally Posted by jo_gobel
wrong, they made 769chp on 91oct
they made 1165chp on 110oct race fuel
they made 1165chp on 110oct race fuel
Originally Posted by Hot Rod Magazine
"The "Brutal" curve is at about the limit of safe 91-octane territory at 14.5 psi of intercooled boost, but when you want it, you can have an absolutely punishing torque curve that rarely dips below 900 lb-ft, and you can brag of 1,000-plus horsepower every day."
09-12-2007, 03:08 PM
#34
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 0
Re: Some problems with new setup
Originally Posted by QikEnuF
Really? Because the Brutal was on pump gas and made 1025chp.. Think you need to up your reading comprehension. Dumb ******
i quoted in my last reply what they stated in the article, sorry i have a job and only briefly read the 5 page article and i missed one sentence that you so politely have pointed out.
ok, i missed a sentence, your right, they tuned for 1000+ chp on 91 oct.
now that you feel better about yourself, how about going back to the original argument. so instead of talking 1000+hp engines that do follow the 1psi=6.8%hp posted earlier, lets get back to the Cavi her that i still think is not as fast as a modded cobalt ss.
also, qikenuf, why are you sticking up for this guy? you dont believe what i say, yet you believe what this guy is saying? is it because of the Cavi love you have for each other? gotta stick up for each other?
09-12-2007, 03:15 PM
#35
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,808
Re: Some problems with new setup
Originally Posted by jo_gobel
ok, i missed a sentence, your right, they tuned for 1000+ chp on 91 oct.
now that you feel better about yourself, how about going back to the original argument. so instead of talking 1000+hp engines that do follow the 1psi=6.8%hp
now that you feel better about yourself, how about going back to the original argument. so instead of talking 1000+hp engines that do follow the 1psi=6.8%hp
Bitchtits, don't get so butthurt. This is HMT
09-12-2007, 03:35 PM
#36
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 0
Re: Some problems with new setup
evidently your the one not reading. look at the link i posted and re read my posts.
the formula is 1psi = 6.8% HP
for the Cavi (and MOST production cars, it works out to about 1psi = 10 chp).
not every engine has the same results.
the formula is 1psi = 6.8% HP
for the Cavi (and MOST production cars, it works out to about 1psi = 10 chp).
not every engine has the same results.
09-12-2007, 04:07 PM
#38
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 0
Re: Some problems with new setup
Originally Posted by QikEnuF
so the formula is correct
anything else you want to try and prove me wrong on, because your not doing a good job.
09-12-2007, 04:14 PM
#40
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,808
Re: Some problems with new setup
Originally Posted by jo_gobel
and yet, i was talking to the original poster about his car and his setup and his engine.
so the formula is correct
anything else you want to try and prove me wrong on, because your not doing a good job.
so the formula is correct
anything else you want to try and prove me wrong on, because your not doing a good job.
