SC61 vs. GT35
#1
SC61 vs. GT35
K24a2 block - K20a2 head - All stock
ive researched and i want the opinion from HMT! atleast the ones with the turbo's themself. ive heard that the Garrett will spool a little faster. 200-300 rpm sooner? Both are good, but one is better!
ive researched and i want the opinion from HMT! atleast the ones with the turbo's themself. ive heard that the Garrett will spool a little faster. 200-300 rpm sooner? Both are good, but one is better!
#5
Re: SC61 vs. GT35
same here, i went with the SC6152S which has the T04S trim compressor which is the same as a GT35R compressor, the exhaust section in the GT35R is a little more efficient but it only equates to 200-300 rpm in spool like you mentioned, and a little bit of responsiveness but id rather have the savings in my pocket from the SC61
#7
Re: SC61 vs. GT35
Originally Posted by TorganFM
Wouldn't pulling timing help it spool faster?
#9
Re: SC61 vs. GT35
Get the SC61. I've ran a couple ball bearing turbos and IMHO they are over-rated and over-priced. Not to mention you can't (really) rebuild a ball bearing turbo. I ran a PTE 60-1 on my 4G for quite some time and it was a very nice street turbo and made (at least to me) really good power at relatively low boost on pump gas. Even a measly 15psi put me well over 300whp and at 28psi spiking 30psi on race gas I made 440whp. Those numbers are according to DSMLINK so I have no idea if they are completely accurate, but it was enough to knock off a K.B. powered Rustang and a T67 powered FD. I did get beat by a 3575 powered 1G but he beat everyone so ---- him and his 75mm turbo.
#10
Re: SC61 vs. GT35
Originally Posted by 2G6
I did get beat by a 3575 powered 1G but he beat everyone so ---- him and his 75mm turbo.