HomemadeTurbo - DIY Turbo Forum

HomemadeTurbo - DIY Turbo Forum (https://www.homemadeturbo.com/)
-   Forced Induction (https://www.homemadeturbo.com/forced-induction-7/)
-   -   Manifold for my R6 (https://www.homemadeturbo.com/forced-induction-7/manifold-my-r6-78723/)

Hitchhikkr 06-08-2007 04:48 PM

Re: Manifold for my R6
 

Originally Posted by theprophet36
Like I said it would be easier to do the v-stacks than it would be not to do them with my plenum design. I do know they work well with N/A as I had them on my last R6. That being said, would they not help atomize the water/meth? Can anyone think of anything negative from using them? Thoughts....

The nozzle is what atomizes the mixture...the design of the manifold affects how it de-atomizes.

Go the cheaper route...Cant really think of how stacks could hurt your setup...---- its gonna fly either way do whatever you want. :P

Tom-Guy 06-08-2007 10:09 PM

Re: Manifold for my R6
 
Atomization is an at idle problem.

The BRMS car runs large poor stomizing Precision 880cc injectors that have to be idled a half point rich to keep things smooth, 585 whp @ 27 psi, and whatever duty it was at the time (I can't recall) worked out to a 0.39 bsfc - for a boosted 1.8 liter. Nothing wrong with the burn on that setup! THe turbulent air exiting the turbo under power is going to forcibly atomize the fuel for you, no worries.

blade8r 06-09-2007 01:31 AM

Re: Manifold for my R6
 

Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
That's the sort of regurgitated statement I hear a lot coming some fuckface wanabe know-it-all who thinks he's right. The truth is that CR has no effect on spool time, but internet racers with "Knowledgeabilites" like to argue. Most arguers have never tried what they are talking about, and even more annoying are the ones who tried their ideas out on their personal car but misperceive the reasons why their car performs as it does because they lack perspective based on extensive experience.

you know what i'm going to have to disagree. personal experiance tells me otherwise. although it was only 1 personal experiance.

btw it was the biggest waste of money i ever invested into. N/a rotary + boost = fire. Pulsation damper owned = Me.

caged 06-09-2007 03:16 AM

Re: Manifold for my R6
 
N/A bridge port rotary + boost=410whp.
Well thats how mine turned out. C/R in a rotary are nothing to do with C/R in piston engine. We boost hi comp rotas all the time.

Hitchhikkr 06-09-2007 10:02 AM

Re: Manifold for my R6
 

Originally Posted by creativepunka
N/A bridge port rotary + boost=410whp.
Well thats how mine turned out. C/R in a rotary are nothing to do with C/R in piston engine. We boost hi comp rotas all the time.

Any rotary+boost= the use of more fuel to do the same amount of mechanical work as a piston engine with less thermal eff. :1

Tom-Guy 06-09-2007 10:39 AM

Re: Manifold for my R6
 

Originally Posted by blade8r
you know what i'm going to have to disagree. personal experiance tells me otherwise.

Your personal experience is wrong. Displacement, cam, timing, AFR all effect spool time. CR does not.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands