Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

2.25 vs. 2.5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2004, 02:14 AM
  #1  
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
groundedcivic91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 34
Default 2.25 vs. 2.5

Ok, can someone explain the benefits of both, useing both or a mix of these diameters as charge pipes.

It would be run on a D16y8 with a t3 at 10psi.

Whats the advantages/disadvantages of both.
groundedcivic91 is offline  
Old 02-20-2004, 02:30 AM
  #2  
3.0 BAR
 
B16Drag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,200
Default Re:2.25 vs. 2.5

uhm... if ur turboed, no exhaust would be the best so 2.5 would flow alot better than 2.25

just make sure u get resonators for it either way so u dont make so much exhaust noise u dont hear ur turbo.

If you mix and match, your exhaust will be restricted to the smallest diameter or ur exhaust... for example if you run a mix of 2.25 and 2.5, its essentially the same as running a 2.25 all the way through. I hope I made sense. Its late..
B16Drag is offline  
Old 02-20-2004, 02:39 AM
  #3  
0.5 BAR
 
Nick7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 127
Default Re:2.25 vs. 2.5

Originally Posted by B16Drag
uhm... if ur turboed, no exhaust would be the best so 2.5 would flow alot better than 2.25

just make sure u get resonators for it either way so u dont make so much exhaust noise u dont hear ur turbo.

If you mix and match, your exhaust will be restricted to the smallest diameter or ur exhaust... for example if you run a mix of 2.25 and 2.5, its essentially the same as running a 2.25 all the way through. I hope I made sense. Its late..
He was talking about charge pipes...

As for that.. you won't notice any difference... altho 2.5" is overkill IMHO.
Nick7 is offline  
Old 02-20-2004, 02:40 AM
  #4  
0.0 BAR
 
MikeJ-2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:2.25 vs. 2.5

Originally Posted by groundedcivic91
charge pipes.
I was hoping he was gonna ask whats the difference between 2.5 and 2.25, but I didn't get that lucky. I guess I could flame B16drag for answering the wrong question though. lol
MikeJ-2009 is offline  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:41 AM
  #5  
con
0.0 BAR
 
con's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:2.25 vs. 2.5

2 is lots on a 1.5 or 1.6 sohc 2.25 is overkill but in a good way. If you go to big its just more volume to fill till you see boost.
con is offline  
Old 02-20-2004, 03:37 PM
  #6  
3.0 BAR
 
B16Drag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,200
Default Re:2.25 vs. 2.5

---- Im tired... I need to sleep before I kill someone hahahah muaahaaha!

Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Originally Posted by groundedcivic91
charge pipes.
I was hoping he was gonna ask whats the difference between 2.5 and 2.25, but I didn't get that lucky. I guess I could flame B16drag for answering the wrong question though. lol
B16Drag is offline  
Old 02-20-2004, 05:16 PM
  #7  
1.5 BAR
 
crx304's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 701
Default Re:2.25 vs. 2.5

ok.... personally i'm gonna run 2 1/8" ID for my charge pipes. the reason being is that if (loke high roller said) you go to big...you'll have no velosity and u have to fill that space (volume) w/ air, which will increase lagg. if you go to small you'll have tons of velosity, but no volume (CFM).... so to keep it on the safe side and have a happy medium.... i'd say go w/ 2" ( www.jcw.com has really good prices on mandrel's)
when the air is introduced to the intercooler, it is broke up and shifted.... this is not so good for the flow, but it has to be done... i would not, say, go w/ staggered charge pipes like the DSM's have incorperated into them.

keep it simple stupid!!!
mike
crx304 is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM.