|
Re: new top mount manifold
Nice very nice looks good
|
Re: new top mount manifold
|
Re: new top mount manifold
|
Re: new top mount manifold
didnt know it was gonna be in a mag? lol...that is you right?
|
Re: new top mount manifold
Originally Posted by turbohf
didnt know it was gonna be in a mag? lol...that is you right?
|
Re: new top mount manifold
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Funny, all the Big Name engine builders I talk to have no opinion if short runner/unequal length or long runner/equal length manifolds make the most power. But, it does affect spool time.
What size pipe did you use for this mani? (diameter and thickness) |
Re: new top mount manifold
Those are not Big Names, those are Honduh Boiz. It's also an invalid test, based on volumetric efficiency ASSumptions and LIES.
I was referring to conversations I've had with Winston Cup winners, Pro-Stock and NHRA record holders. Would you like to read a writeup I did on manifold theory, based on the existing body of work out there, of which Full-Race and Friends is neither going to discover anything new or in any way expand upon? It's very basic, meant for the n00b, so it does not even touch on the effects of exhaust pressure (density), Mach (a dimensionless ratio), ad nauseam? edit: I cleaned up a bit on that HT thread, circa page three. Enjoy ;) |
Re: new top mount manifold
Originally Posted by slowteg550
You might want to take a look at this http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1515492
What size pipe did you use for this mani? (diameter and thickness) |
Re: new top mount manifold
Originally Posted by 98redcavz24
Must be nice :S
|
Re: new top mount manifold
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Would you like to read a writeup I did on manifold theory, based on the existing body of work out there,
Actually, yes. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands