|
Re: PLX M-300 or AEM UEGO?
allows you to replicate a narrowband o2 sensor, helps for datalogging or running 1 o2 sensor
|
Re: PLX M-300 or AEM UEGO?
Originally Posted by B18TurboEF
allows you to replicate a narrowband o2 sensor, helps for datalogging or running 1 o2 sensor
A linear WB output is more accurate when you are datalogging it and simple math = faster datalogging. |
Re: PLX M-300 or AEM UEGO?
from my uego users manual i just got friday
The AEM default position is (P0). When set to (P0) (Figure 10A) the gauge displays AFR values. (P1) is the same as (P0) except that the gauge displays lambda values. These settings (P1 and P0) implement a linear calibration with the most useful voltage range possible (0-5V). so right in the book it basicly says it has linear output... or did i read it wrong ??? |
Re: PLX M-300 or AEM UEGO?
no one has anything to say on what i posted ???
|
Re: PLX M-300 or AEM UEGO?
thats cuz no one is rich enough to get that wb. or atleast everyone chooses not to because it offers the same ---- as zt2 or the innovates, and those are cheaper.
|
Re: PLX M-300 or AEM UEGO?
Originally Posted by d112crzy
thats cuz no one is rich enough to get that wb. or atleast everyone chooses not to because it offers the same ---- as zt2 or the innovates, and those are cheaper.
it was only $265 from a sponsor on H-T |
Re: PLX M-300 or AEM UEGO?
Ah still, most Honda ECU programming is setup to work with PLX Devices so I'd still go with it.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands