Offcial "How-to" - Setting up TurboEdit Basemaps
1.0 BAR
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 524
Re:Offcial "How-to" - Setting up TurboEdit Basemaps
I was trying to use the excel basemap helper.. but when i go to type in the new headings some of the columns turn to 0.00s.. any idea why?
this is difficult because im just trying to convert the stock pm6 to a stable ng rom and i cant
this is difficult because im just trying to convert the stock pm6 to a stable ng rom and i cant
Thread Starter
3.0 BAR
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,447
Re:Offcial "How-to" - Setting up TurboEdit Basemaps
Originally Posted by green91
I was trying to use the excel basemap helper.. but when i go to type in the new headings some of the columns turn to 0.00s.. any idea why?
Play with the IF() statements in the code to expand the range.
I HOPE to make a plugin someday for TE...
1.5 BAR
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 808
Re:Offcial "How-to" - Setting up TurboEdit Basemaps
Originally Posted by xenocron
Hopefully eventually I can get Jason's help in writing a plugin that does all of the stuff automatically.
Basically it would be a little wizard where you would pick which engine, which injectors, what boost efficiency and how to retard ignition and TE would do all of the work for you.
Anyone that knows VB or the other supported languages for writing TE plugins might be more efficient than I though, so if you think it's something you could help with, let us know.
Basically it would be a little wizard where you would pick which engine, which injectors, what boost efficiency and how to retard ignition and TE would do all of the work for you.
Anyone that knows VB or the other supported languages for writing TE plugins might be more efficient than I though, so if you think it's something you could help with, let us know.
0.5 BAR
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 63
Re:Offcial "How-to" - Setting up TurboEdit Basemaps
"linear is safer but with a touch less power, step is a touch more risky but probably smoother and more power"
what, exactly, is the differnce between them? how is step more risky?
what, exactly, is the differnce between them? how is step more risky?
Thread Starter
3.0 BAR
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,447
Re:Offcial "How-to" - Setting up TurboEdit Basemaps
Originally Posted by yungtuner
"linear is safer but with a touch less power, step is a touch more risky but probably smoother and more power"
what, exactly, is the differnce between them? how is step more risky?
what, exactly, is the differnce between them? how is step more risky?
As Blundar recommends, step is a little more natural. We dont retard any timing until 3 psi...then generall .25 degrees every 3 psi. (6-9psi .5 retard) (9+psi .75 or 1)
Linear resembles more what the MSD BTM timing retard devices do.
3.0 BAR
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,056
Re:Offcial "How-to" - Setting up TurboEdit Basemaps
i can make basemaps the 'easy way' no problem, but along with a few others, i'm not sure i understand the excel basemap helper? are you saying we really don't need to change toe column heading for the current codes, it's just an available option for a future code that may have different headings 
so basically you can just copy and paste the stock map in to the excel sheet, then copy the new map it gives you in to the stable bin and you're good to go?? but you only paste in the vacuum maps, so you would actually only paste in over to column '0' in the stable rom? i may be looking too deep in to it, but it's confusing me.
so basically you can just copy and paste the stock map in to the excel sheet, then copy the new map it gives you in to the stable bin and you're good to go?? but you only paste in the vacuum maps, so you would actually only paste in over to column '0' in the stable rom? i may be looking too deep in to it, but it's confusing me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
70Challenger
Wanted
1
Jun 22, 2006 01:56 AM
