Greddy Emanage vs SAFC vs SMT6
#1
Greddy Emanage vs SAFC vs SMT6
So, seeing as how I have a Toyo, I don't really have the option of chipping my ECU for my fuel/ignition control.
I have an SAFC and MSD BTM now, but I don't like how I don't have complete control over my timing, and I don't like how limiting the SAFC is.
The Greddy emanage (blue box) looks nice, and I could get everything I needed if I sold my safc/msd and what not. I like it because I can get the Injector/Ignition harness and have a table for each. The only problem is that I don't know what the max -/+ values I can use for it (I think they're -/+ 20%, which I don't think is enough for my 450's). Also, I don't know if I need the pressure harness/sensor, as I have a 2 bar map sensor in there right now. I also don't know if I would need a support tool for it, or what the benefit of the support tool is.
The SMT6 is pretty big in the Toyota community, and in case people don't know, here's the site for it -
http://www.perfectpower.com/products/smt6.asp
I think that may be my best choice, but I'm not sure as how much I can correct the fuel tables (-/+ %).
If anybody has any imput that would be awesome, Thanks,
Colin
I have an SAFC and MSD BTM now, but I don't like how I don't have complete control over my timing, and I don't like how limiting the SAFC is.
The Greddy emanage (blue box) looks nice, and I could get everything I needed if I sold my safc/msd and what not. I like it because I can get the Injector/Ignition harness and have a table for each. The only problem is that I don't know what the max -/+ values I can use for it (I think they're -/+ 20%, which I don't think is enough for my 450's). Also, I don't know if I need the pressure harness/sensor, as I have a 2 bar map sensor in there right now. I also don't know if I would need a support tool for it, or what the benefit of the support tool is.
The SMT6 is pretty big in the Toyota community, and in case people don't know, here's the site for it -
http://www.perfectpower.com/products/smt6.asp
I think that may be my best choice, but I'm not sure as how much I can correct the fuel tables (-/+ %).
If anybody has any imput that would be awesome, Thanks,
Colin
#5
Re: Greddy Emanage vs SAFC vs SMT6
Originally Posted by slappynuts
I have used the SMT6 on quite a few different makes of cars(including toyota)and have had really good luck with them.
I've got an SAFC and an MSD BTM, but the BTM really messes with my tach, doesn't work well.
I really like the SMT6, I'm worried it wont help me "enough"
Stock injectors on my car are 170cc, where I have DSM 450's in there now. I have an Aeromotive FPR (adjustable, 1:1 refference w/ boost), so I can scale down my fuel pressure as needed. I also have a 2 bar map sensor in place of my 1 bar map sensor, so the car runs perfectly with about 340 cc injectors in there. Acts stock. Would the SMT6 let me control my fuel enough through all the rpms? I want to be able to throw a lot of fuel in there at the high rpms (going to be running a .63/.60). Would this work for me?
#9
Re: Greddy Emanage vs SAFC vs SMT6
Originally Posted by Whitey
Have you looked into Megasquirt yet? It'll be the more difficult route but cheaper and overall better in the long run
No piggyback can do exactly what I want, so it looks like megasquirt