Econo-Box

There is nothing better than reading JD ownage first thing int he morning. Thanks for that, it made my day a little better

b18.

You're old

fe3tcourier

LOL, this is almost as comical as what i'm about to post in the next thread.

however the apparatus was NOT setup to measure what we are discussing, and thus could not have measured the difference regardless. I posted a clearly written methodology of testing this principle and it was ignored. to summarise, you need two iat sensors (accurate ones), a long pipe with good insulation, high IATs (is your 250 the international standard measure, or some funky fahrenheit ----?), and a small amount of finely misted water such that none is still water when it makes it to the other end where the second sensor waits. only with such apparatus could such a point be proved, and NOT otherwise. your literature DID NOT use such apparatus, and thus was NOT valid in this context.

the parts of it that you quoted did not pertain to the object of discussion... as fawlty once said "what is the bloody point".

no loss to me sunshine, go right ahead.

this better : http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/IQBasics.aspx

i already knew the old school iq name scale, it was just the first place that popped up to illustrate my point.

it goes into the change of state... 1g of water vapour at 100C hold far more energy than 1g of water at 100C. that my friend is the point.

moot or not, it was an inaccurate statement, and i cant let those slide, even when the poster is golden in his own eyes, and those of others on a given board.

ososlohatch

jd > feet

AWDstylez

For me, there's nothing better than watching people like yourself bandwagon off of him or someone else because you don't know enough to form your own opinion. Don't make yourself look stupid by taking sides in an argument that you don't even understand. That seems to be a habit of a significant number of people on this site.


Scott you're funny. Ricer logic FTL, "This guys car did xx.xx @ xx.xx so therefore mine will do the same thing."

I was in a 100 shot LS1 Z28 before (plus full bolt ons and gears), it's NOT fast. Let me know when you buy a real car, otherwise I'll see you around CobaltSS.net, the site for "fast" and "baller" dumbestic econobox owners.

scottsi

Actually its more like 1000 peoples cars did this so theres a chance mine may do this. Just become some retard ran a 13.0 on 100shot dry on a hurt LS1 doesn't mean nitrous LS1's are slow. Infact its much different. In youre gay gay video you barely beat a stock terminator. I beat a full bolton terminator, pulley, intake, headers exhaust. And a full bolton terminator would smoke the ---- out of you. And speaking of ricer logic wasn't it you that said. X beat Y and Z beat Y so i hang with Y so therefore i can beat X. Stop being retarded Tyler.

AWDstylez

Considering he trapped 107mph bone stock I'd say the motor wasn't hurt. I think YOU need to step back into reality. F-body owners are the same as Mustang owners, they all exaggerate their times and underexaggerate their mod list. What those guys didn't tell you is that they had a cam, heads, a built motor, and full drag suspension... oh but yea, they had a 100 shot too.

I'm unaware of any cars that I've "barely" beat. The races are always over in 2-3 seconds when the other person gives up from 7 buses back.

Your car is going no where. Come back with a time slip and then start talking ----.

Woulda, coulda, shoulda: Hopes and Dreams Racing Inc.

jinxy

ban until this kid doesn't feel the need to spout off bullshit in every thread.

scottsi

When you have a car start talking ----. Your pile of trash has been broken for two months. Does a trans swap really take that long? Or are you just that stupid and poor.

I vote ban aswell. Johnny get in here and regulate.

ososlohatch

dsm
Damn ***** Malfunctioning