J-SMITH69

honda crv gets PATHETIC gas mileage for the puny i4 engine it has in it. and you cannot pull anything with it or put a lot of ---- in it.

2004 Honda CR-V LX 4WD 5-spd MT
2.4-Liter i-VTEC(TM), I4, 16-Valve, DOHC, MPFI Engine, Front/Transverse Mounted With Horsepower Of 160@6000, Torque Of 162@3600 and Alloy Block and Cylinder Heads
Fuel Economy Cty/Hwy: 21 / 25
Combined Fuel Economy 23

2004 Chevrolet Blazer 4-Door 2WD LS
4.3-Liter, 90-Degree Vortec V6, 12-Valve, OHV, SEFI Engine, Front/Longitudinal Mounted With Horsepower Of 190@4400, Torque Of 250@2800, Cast Iron Block and Cast Iron Cylinder Heads
Fuel Economy Cty/Hwy: 16 / 21
Combined Fuel Economy 18

OnYx

i dont covsider any SUV a honda....

J-SMITH69

normal everyday people do not want to drive around in a car that has to rev to 8k to flow with traffic. its a fact of life. torque = driving pleasure.

the 100hp/l arguement is ricer-ish

OnYx

your arugment it more like not thinking... its the "we have to have the biggest thing ever" argument.

J-SMITH69

new honda civic is 1.7l and makes 110hp
thats about 64hp/l

vette z06 5.7l 405hp
thats about 71hp/l

vette coupe 5.7l 350hp
thats about 61hp/l

svt mustang 4.6l 390hp
thats about 84hp/l

gt mustang 4.6l 260hp
thats about 56hp/l

accord sedan 2.4l 160hp
thats about 66hp/l

GMC yukon denahli 6.0l 320hp/360ft-lbs
thats about 61hp/l

2003 Ferrari 360 Modena Berlinetta 3.6l 400hp
thats about 111hp/l

03 cavvy 2.2l 140hp/150ft-lbs
thats about 63hp/l

04 navvy 5.4l 300hp/350ft-lbs
thats about 55hp/l

2004 Dodge Truck Ram 1500 SRT-10 8.3l 500hp/525ft-lbs
thats about 60hp/l

airtonics

simmer down ladies

rudebwoy

everytime I'm on the streets, a domestic car is holding up traffic, rent them they suck at take off, and maxed out at 100mph, I will take the most expensive dodge out that list and sell it and buy a honda, imports no matter what country are better than domestics. and dont even bring those muscle cars in the mix, cause they are in a different class. s2000 bettter than a srt4. wrx better than sr4 . evo better than srt4. eclipese better than srt4. 1.5l turbo honda better than 2.4l turbo srt4 get the point and also domestic cars are uncomfortable with stupid designs, good supporting our country, but others have different ways being a patriot than buying a POS car.....

J-SMITH69

ricers

srt4 is 19k

evo is 30k
sti is 30k
s2000 is 30k and will get beat in a straight line by a srt4

turbo eclipses are about 1 1/2 seconds slower than a srt4 and cost more.

the new v6 GT eclipses are about 26k and are slow as *****

1.5l turbo honda is gunna have a hard time making 230hp, and will not make 250ft-lbs of torque

srt4 is a lot faster than a wrx and costs about 5k less.

MikeJ-2009

I haven't seen the arguement of price yet, which is more of a concern to me than anything. I'd rather own a $2000 crx with $3000 worth of motor and turbo than a srt4 and pay for it until I'm 90. Plus, being car people, what are you gonna do to the SRT4? Nothing. My crx has plenty of things to do to it, and at the end I'll be ripping some *** for about $5000. That's where I come from.

Donald125

""Being car people.""

i liked it