signorelli21

yea its pretty hard to convince people (myself included) to vote for any of the mainstream candidates, mainly because they aren't offering anything substantial. hillary is a no brainer because she is as fake as they come and only does whats popular, obama just keeps repeating ---- about healthcare and that its time for change, but never says what that change should be, other than our current administration is currupt and untrustworthy, well no ----.

i don't support anyone that is afraid to talk about things because others might disagree with them, Dr Paul is the only one that seems to offer a little of everything for everyone.

He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.

He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.

He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.

Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.

jinxy

Hillary is a political tool who doesn't give a ---- about anyone but herself.


barack is playing the nog card, he's nothing special and doesn't ave any ideas other than the regular bullshit pre-fed lobbyist agendas.

signorelli21

yea here is a clip from it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=styYI...elated&search=

Slo_crx1

I'd go for Guliani (that's if Ron didn't make it to the ballot of course ) just because I've seen first-hand what he's done for NY city when he was mayor. IMO he was one of the best mayor's that city ever had, and he kept his word on alot of the promises he made. Not to mention he's a down to earth guy...http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070515/...i_vonspreckens. I think that article is a good way to describe how he is, very honest and sincere. Besides, the guy dealt pretty well with a city laiden with crime, he should do well with that in the white house

USS

He gets my vote

QikEnuF

I vote for Bob Dole

Bob Dole wants to hear Bob Dole talk about Bob Dole.....BOB DOLE

Actually, Obama is a nog and that is the only reason he gets any kind of publicity; Hillary is a bitch who whines about everything and has fed off of her husband's popularity her whole political career. Go Rudy

signorelli21

Rudy should just stick to being mayor, lol. you can't really argue that he did a good job cleaning up new york and lowering the crime rate, etc.

But, he is openly addmitted to being impatient and single minded on policy issues.

he is stubborn and very rash/ emmotionally driven making decisions before he has all the facts, like his debate where he got mad at Ron Paul for stating that american foreign policy played a role in 9/11, which is in the 911 commission report( several times) and the cia intelligence reports prior to 911.

also after 911 he was more concerned with reopening wall street and getting things moving than he was with the safety of the people working on the pile, and he would not let FEMA do their job by taking over the management of ground zero, plus they told everyone the air was safe to breathe when it was full of asbestos, etc.

anyway, i just see too much of george bush in MR giuliani, we don't need anouther bumbling idiot that does not listen to his advisors or the people that voted him into office, we don't need any more wars to defend us from the evil terrorists, and we don't need anouther propaganda minister.

J-SMITH69

you go too far... i doubt the next president will do much different.

what do you think will stop the terrorist? your kind words? the want to kill you and they won't stop. if one of those guys was next to you right now he would slit your throat without thinking about it.

i think this is more serious than you are realising.

signorelli21

thats true, but why do you think they want to kill us so badly? because they hate our freedoms or because we are rich?

This was the second fatwa (declaration of war) written by osama bin laden in 1998, they make it perfectly clear what we need to do to protect outrselves from terrorism.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terroris...atwa_1998.html

First, for over seven years the United States has been occupying the lands of Islam in the holiest of places, the Arabian Peninsula, plundering its riches, dictating to its rulers, humiliating its people, terrorizing its neighbors, and turning its bases in the Peninsula into a spearhead through which to fight the neighboring Muslim peoples.

If some people have in the past argued about the fact of the occupation, all the people of the Peninsula have now acknowledged it. The best proof of this is the Americans' continuing aggression against the Iraqi people using the Peninsula as a staging post, even though all its rulers are against their territories being used to that end, but they are helpless.

The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies -- civilians and military -- is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it, in order to liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque and the holy mosque [Mecca] from their grip, and in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any Muslim. This is in accordance with the words of Almighty God, "and fight the pagans all together as they fight you all together," and "fight them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God."