Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)
#31
Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)
Originally Posted by AbaZ
Your car also had stock suspension, lol...
I've been in a s2k around 145mph on a track and it felt pretty stable to me. Those cars may not be fast johnny, but a itr, ctr, s2000 can all smoke your 5.0l fox body mustang in stock form.
I've been in a s2k around 145mph on a track and it felt pretty stable to me. Those cars may not be fast johnny, but a itr, ctr, s2000 can all smoke your 5.0l fox body mustang in stock form.
compare those cars to GTs of the same year, stang wins for cheaper
completly stock 5.0l foxbody + 4.10 rear end gears = 13.5 1/4
faster than all those for the 110 it costs for gears
#32
Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)
The roads are not so good over here, except highways, so the first thing the kids do when they buy a car is spend 1500 € (+-1900 dollars) in a suspension and rims and tires.
Yeah this cars are very very stable.
Yeah this cars are very very stable.
#33
Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)
Originally Posted by random-strike
Originally Posted by AbaZ
Your car also had stock suspension, lol...
I've been in a s2k around 145mph on a track and it felt pretty stable to me. Those cars may not be fast johnny, but a itr, ctr, s2000 can all smoke your 5.0l fox body mustang in stock form.
I've been in a s2k around 145mph on a track and it felt pretty stable to me. Those cars may not be fast johnny, but a itr, ctr, s2000 can all smoke your 5.0l fox body mustang in stock form.
compare those cars to GTs of the same year, stang wins for cheaper
completly stock 5.0l foxbody + 4.10 rear end gears = 13.5 1/4
faster than all those for the 110 it costs for gears
#34
Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)
Originally Posted by nonvtec
Originally Posted by random-strike
Originally Posted by AbaZ
Your car also had stock suspension, lol...
I've been in a s2k around 145mph on a track and it felt pretty stable to me. Those cars may not be fast johnny, but a itr, ctr, s2000 can all smoke your 5.0l fox body mustang in stock form.
I've been in a s2k around 145mph on a track and it felt pretty stable to me. Those cars may not be fast johnny, but a itr, ctr, s2000 can all smoke your 5.0l fox body mustang in stock form.
compare those cars to GTs of the same year, stang wins for cheaper
completly stock 5.0l foxbody + 4.10 rear end gears = 13.5 1/4
faster than all those for the 110 it costs for gears
ive seen 13.8 with 4.10 gears
believe me it makes a gigantic difference.
#36
Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)
I liked the video crazy to go that fast for that long.But whats the use for the 4.10 gears if you can only drive from stop light to stop light.My 77 camoaro had the 4.10 gears an i was up against the msd 6k chip rev limiter at 125 so i put in the 7k chip cuz needed that 15mph to stay with jeff.LOL But sbc dont like 7k for long periods.I never held it there but the guy i sold the car did an well it grenanded. 2 valve stuck in the pistons, stem first an now the block has access to 2 cyls at once.LOL
#37
Re:Video S2000 Vs Itr Vs Ctr Vs VTi(Si ferio)
Originally Posted by Cadracer
I liked the video crazy to go that fast for that long.But whats the use for the 4.10 gears if you can only drive from stop light to stop light.My 77 camoaro had the 4.10 gears an i was up against the msd 6k chip rev limiter at 125 so i put in the 7k chip cuz needed that 15mph to stay with jeff.LOL But sbc does like 7k for long periods.I never held it there but the guy i sold the car did an well it grenanded. 2 valve stuck in the pistons stem first an now the block has access to 2 cyls at once.LOL
my stang has a cobra rear end with 3.55 gears. they still feel really tall but i think they will be very nice when the engine is charged. but im partial to 3.73s