turbo ford gt . com
04-30-2006, 02:04 PM
#61
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by BlackDragon
rarely the hit 12's its mostly a low 13 sec car. that pretty impessive since it only has 290 hp to the crank. The reason because its such a light vehicle. honda had 16 years to think of a new design and power for the new nsx. When it first came out it was very impressive for its time...just overpriced. Im sure they are going to impress us again with the new model.
and in the early 90 the corvette was anyhwere from a low 14 sec car to a high 13 sec car...except for the ZR-1 model which was a 12 sec car. so the nsx and corvette were pretty dead track even back then and it was only a v6.
and in the early 90 the corvette was anyhwere from a low 14 sec car to a high 13 sec car...except for the ZR-1 model which was a 12 sec car. so the nsx and corvette were pretty dead track even back then and it was only a v6.
and the nsx isnt that light. it weights what 3100lbs? my mustang weights that much
04-30-2006, 02:05 PM
#62
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by FastLS
According to Top Gear the GT40(or GT I forgot which was the correct name) is rated at 4MPG.
that show is competely biased, and the LIE constantly on that show. that show is not a real car show, it is entertainment.
04-30-2006, 02:08 PM
#63
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Re: turbo ford gt . com
1991 Acura NSX 5.8 14.4
1992 Acura NSX 5.6 13.9
1993 Acura NSX 5.6 13.9
1994 Acura NSX 5.3 13.6
1996 Acura NSX 5.2 13.8
1996 Acura NSX-T 5.8 14.3
1997 Acura NSX-T 4.8 13.3
2001 Acura NSX V6 4.5 12.9 (C&D TV 2001)
2002 Acura NSX 4.8 13.4
On average, high 13 low 14 car like johnny said.
Curb Weight: 3160 lbs. for the NSX
Curb Weight: 2827 lbs. for the Mustang GT 5.0 hatch
So its actually lighter, haha. The NSX has more hp, the 5.0 has much more torque
1992 Acura NSX 5.6 13.9
1993 Acura NSX 5.6 13.9
1994 Acura NSX 5.3 13.6
1996 Acura NSX 5.2 13.8
1996 Acura NSX-T 5.8 14.3
1997 Acura NSX-T 4.8 13.3
2001 Acura NSX V6 4.5 12.9 (C&D TV 2001)
2002 Acura NSX 4.8 13.4
On average, high 13 low 14 car like johnny said.
Curb Weight: 3160 lbs. for the NSX
Curb Weight: 2827 lbs. for the Mustang GT 5.0 hatch
So its actually lighter, haha. The NSX has more hp, the 5.0 has much more torque
04-30-2006, 03:49 PM
#65
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Originally Posted by N1ghtM0nkey
Maybe I have a very creative imagination, or a dirty one....
Doesn't it kind of look like the BOV is about to *** rape the intake piping?
Doesn't it kind of look like the BOV is about to *** rape the intake piping?
It does look like it. hahaha
04-30-2006, 05:13 PM
#67
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 0
Re: turbo ford gt . com
Haha whoa I see some people really didn't like my post. Don't get me wrong, I love Ford and the Ford GT. I just really don't have much respect for chevy, and like 5thgenlx said, thats just my opinion. I read an article in USA today a few weeks ago that talked about the top cars of 06 and rated a lot of car companies in respect to the average number of new cars that had problems out of every 100. All the japanese makes scored 10-11, ford i believe was maybe 14, chevy was a little higher, maybe 16? I don't remember the exact numbers, but one prop to chevy would be that the german companies did a lot worse, in the high teens and low 20's, with I believe porsche scoring the worst because of their cayenne SUV's. I never said Honda was the greatest car company or that the nsx was the greatest sports car. Personally I will never own a sports car at all--even if I won one I'd sell it and buy myself a civic and keep the extra cash. ANYWAY, the Ford GT is a pimp car.
