Originally Posted by EGgyLShatch

Ok, I give props to you whitey for having sweet projects like your tt stang and the fuel injected turbo banshee, and I just can't imagine how you would ever make the comparison between the nsx and the zo6. Not only is the NSX a way sexier and more refined vehicle, but GM is the very symbol of substandard engineering and quality control. The 7 liter 8 cylinder engine producing 505 horsepower is a joke compared to any performance minded engine that honda puts out, and thats a proven fact-- the nsx puts out more horsepower per liter than any engine gm has ever produced. Thats true of all of honda's performance engines, especially the f20c-- 240 hp out of an NA 2.0l engine. If GM was anywhere near the qualilty and control of honda, its 7 liter uber engine slushbox for the (gay, small ***** compensation) corvette would produce at least 700 hp stock from the factory, and then it would only be matching the B16 engine that honda produced over 10 years ago. Its smaller price tag only relates is poor quality. If it was to match the output of an S2000 it would have 980hp, and we're talking factory numbers. Not to mention every old white man and his mother owns a corvette. The NSX is on a level of its own, a level way above that of a shitbox corvette

Originally Posted by Alex in Houston

You really need to live in the Houston area to understand why that is such a bullshit statement.
John Hennesy is a crook at best (do a search for his name and law suits, you'll catch on quick) On top of that, the few cars that the owners actually received, all belw up in short order. John recently bought one of out local tracks and is having a hard time getting patrons as anyone in the know avoids him like the Plague.

Originally Posted by random-strike

ya but it doesnt mean the gt isnt cool

Originally Posted by Whitey

An NSX is an overpriced underpowered car bottom line. Like I said before an NSX should be on the same level as a G35, not a $90,000 car. ---- if you want to compare HP to liter arguements than a 370cc Banshee motor puts out 472hp per liter so even your S2000 motor is an inferior design.


Yeah I'm aware of the lawsuits, I just posted that becuase whenever someone posts a supercar Johnny always compares it to a domestic that puts out more power at a cheaper price. I didn't think people would get all bent out of shape becuase of it.


Yeah its cool but for the price I'd choose something else

Originally Posted by random-strike

id get a c6 z06, but i like the ford too! and the srt10 viper!!! hard choice

Originally Posted by Whitey

I'd buy an NSX since it is superior to ever other car ever made.

Originally Posted by random-strike

yeap 290crank hp and even less hp really melts my butter.

14 flat here i come!

Originally Posted by Dibble

Dont be silly. They run 12.90s. GOSH!!!!!!!


That GT is sick.
Gotta love the haters. Some people who know they will never have anything nice, just hate instead of giving props. Most of the times its because there ***** is small.

Originally Posted by random-strike

you're crazy id rather have a bone stock gt than my tt stang. no q asked

gt can be a dailey, they get ~24-26mpg highway. its better than drivin a v8 truck

Originally Posted by FastLS

According to Top Gear the GT40(or GT I forgot which was the correct name) is rated at 4MPG.