General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

Toyota MR2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2005, 06:36 PM
  #31  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:Toyota MR2

all stock mr2s are slow as donkey ***** and are ugly as sin. and a stock turbo supra would eat it alive on a road course because it is so much faster.

im sure you can make em fast.

fieros are ugly as sin too but at least you can buy a kit to put a v8 in it.

btw neither MR2s or supras are true sports cars.

front engine, rear drive, 2 seats
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 06:50 PM
  #32  
3.0 BAR
 
Donald125's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 6,279
Default Re:Toyota MR2

Originally Posted by random-strike
front engine, rear drive, 2 seats
so u are saying Ferraris F50, Honda NSX and such are not true sport cars?
Donald125 is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 06:52 PM
  #33  
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
 
D16Y7-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 192
Default Re:Toyota MR2

Originally Posted by SpeedyJAY


The SW engine you refer to is from the 1st gen MR2's, the second gen got the 3SGTE (also found in the Celica GT-S) it is a closed deck block made of cast Iron, w/ and aluminum head. Like most toyota engines the engine is almost bombproof, and caple of lots and lots of boost, a lot more then the dinky turbo it comes with provides.


The first gen MR2 was the AW11 not the SW. And it was never found in the Celica GT-S, it was in the Celica All-Trac Turbo. It(MR2) came with the 4AGE and the 4AGZE(supercharged). The second gen MR2 is the SW and all of the 2nd gen cars came with the 3SGTE(Turbo) of the 5SFE(NA). The newer of hte SW's came with a the option of LSD and it was stronger as well. Same withe 1st gens in 87 there was a lot done to the block for strength.
D16Y7-T is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 06:56 PM
  #34  
3.0 BAR
 
dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,155
Default Re:Toyota MR2

Originally Posted by Donald125
Originally Posted by random-strike
front engine, rear drive, 2 seats
so u are saying Ferraris F50, Honda NSX and such are not true sport cars?
To me a sport car is a two seater thats fast. I think we discussed this before a while back. The nsx is a sport car ansd so is the Ferraris. When i think of honda sport car I think of the s2k. imo the mr2 and supra are toyota sports car.
dragon is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 10:52 PM
  #35  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:Toyota MR2

Originally Posted by BlackDragon
Originally Posted by Donald125
Originally Posted by random-strike
front engine, rear drive, 2 seats
so u are saying Ferraris F50, Honda NSX and such are not true sport cars?
To me a sport car is a two seater thats fast. I think we discussed this before a while back. The nsx is a sport car ansd so is the Ferraris. When i think of honda sport car I think of the s2k. imo the mr2 and supra are toyota sports car.
i italic'd true sports car because that is the traditional definition.

now there is not a real standard definition. but usually two seats/two doors/built for speed not luxury.
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 11:18 PM
  #36  
3.0 BAR
 
scottsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,935
Default Re:Toyota MR2

why does everyone say anythign but a honda is a bitch to work on, hondas are so ------ simple, you should try working on something else and being a little diverse who give s ashit if its hard to work on, more props to you.
scottsi is offline  
Old 02-09-2005, 02:07 AM
  #37  
1.5 BAR
 
ibassez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 897
Default Re:Toyota MR2

i got one for sale 91 turbo leather 95 wheels only 102k miles 5 speed mr2 like that will sell for 6 grand on ebay only thing wrong is that the turbo is blown because of that it dies out once in a while ill will be posting it soon 4500 bucks
sorry for the size of the picture tryin to show detail





ibassez is offline  
Old 02-09-2005, 06:25 AM
  #38  
3.0 BAR
 
B16CRXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,133
Default Re:Toyota MR2

I have a white 1985 MR2 that runs perfectly. They aer fun lil cars
B16CRXT is offline  
Old 02-09-2005, 08:59 AM
  #39  
USS
0.0 BAR
 
USS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re:Toyota MR2

The 3SGTE's top end pretty much sucks because of the freak'n ct26 turbo man. It becomes such a bottle neck for that engine. If I were in the market for an MR2, I'd get a NA one with the 5sfe in it, and turbocharge that. The 3sgte exhaust manifold, turbo, and downpipe all fit perfectly. Then all you need is a SMIC, some Supra NA injectors, supra NA map sensor, fuel pump, and then you boost that bitch... wait wait wait, that's my setup!
USS is offline  
Old 02-09-2005, 09:19 AM
  #40  
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
 
D16Y7-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 192
Default Re:Toyota MR2

Originally Posted by Snafubmx234
The 3SGTE's top end pretty much sucks because of the freak'n ct26 turbo man. It becomes such a bottle neck for that engine. If I were in the market for an MR2, I'd get a NA one with the 5sfe in it, and turbocharge that. The 3sgte exhaust manifold, turbo, and downpipe all fit perfectly. Then all you need is a SMIC, some Supra NA injectors, supra NA map sensor, fuel pump, and then you boost that bitch... wait wait wait, that's my setup!
I havent seen too many of them out there boosted that is why I was assuming with the higher comp ration that it wasnt really liked among MR2 owners. As far as the strength of the block compared to the 3SGTE how does it hold up? What are you running for boost? And is the transmission in the CND models the only difference between ours and yours down south because the base model is almost two seconds faster in the 0-60 and a second faster in the 1/4 mile specifications. As well there are some differences in the transaxle I think.
D16Y7-T is offline  


Quick Reply: Toyota MR2



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.