thompson won the debate???
#14
Re: thompson won the debate???
nice fake ron paul liberal nutswingers in the video. if they actually would listen to paul they would know he doesn't support them, and he doesn't support harassing people, screaming at people, and all the other stupid ---- those liberals do.
they are FAKE and if they knew anything about paul, and his views other than "out of iraq" they wouldn't support him. those people are morons in the highest degree
they are FAKE and if they knew anything about paul, and his views other than "out of iraq" they wouldn't support him. those people are morons in the highest degree
#15
Re: thompson won the debate???
Not to mention Glen Beck eluding to the fact that if you support Paul you could be potentially supporting a dangerous campaign of domestic terrorists.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Rc4OJWH1nE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Rc4OJWH1nE
#16
Re: thompson won the debate???
Originally Posted by random-strike
more CT theories.
fox is a private enterprise, don't watch it if you don't like it. that simple?
people don't watch the left wing channels
fox is a private enterprise, don't watch it if you don't like it. that simple?
people don't watch the left wing channels
I think the purpose of this post is more to inform about how little credibility fox news have so others don't take it seriously, rather than complaining about how they run their organization and saying they should run it more fairly.
P.S. Quit acting like Ron Paul is your personal boyfriend.
#18
Re: thompson won the debate???
yea i mean i always try to avoid the conspiracies regarding the media but there wasn't one this time, I mean during the dabate one of the questions was, " Dr Paul, the next question is about electability, so basically do you have any?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8Tkm...com/node/24381
How the ---- can you say that isn't bias? they don't say things like that to thompson or guiliani, even though Paul has raised more money and did better than guiliani in Iowa ( he got what, like 4%) and thompson in new hampshire he got like 1.5% but there is no question of their "electibility". the focus group ---- is just trying to use "group think" to manipulate peoples opinion, its not hard to tell that Frank Luntz is leading those people and i wouldn't be suprised if they weren't paid to be there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8Tkm...com/node/24381
How the ---- can you say that isn't bias? they don't say things like that to thompson or guiliani, even though Paul has raised more money and did better than guiliani in Iowa ( he got what, like 4%) and thompson in new hampshire he got like 1.5% but there is no question of their "electibility". the focus group ---- is just trying to use "group think" to manipulate peoples opinion, its not hard to tell that Frank Luntz is leading those people and i wouldn't be suprised if they weren't paid to be there.