yellowcrx6

hondas are much more reliable. dsms require alot of upkeep, or at least every that i know who has them. however, u can make a stock awd very fast for very cheap. its all up 2 u, its your car

tuning art

HMM EVERYONE TELLING ME TO GO DSM BUT ARE THEY RELIABLE LIKE THE TRANNY AND ---- ?

hotrex

honda

turbohf

i know of two people presonally that drive DSM's to work everyday...everyday meaning that they havent had problems YET...im sure both with scatter there trannies, one with shear HP, the other one stupidity...

DONT buy a Prelude/Accord...unless of couse your a ricer then go ahead...

LSD Motorsports

If its a low mileage stock vehicle then it is pretty damn reliable, its a factory car. And it japanese, they have plenty of reliability, Get the Dsm and launch at 6k all day at every light otherwise dont sell out

BigJ

Two Words, CRANK WALK, that will cost you a bit.....

and yes the trannys suck ***

CivicComingSoon

projekteg

---- it, try a dsm.....

Carnesd

I am planning on buying an older dsm when I get my crx "finished." What i've heard is that it's easy to make a dsm fast, but expensive to keep it that way. ie fixing parts all the time and trannies do break if you launch like a madman. I would say get yourself an old civic hatch for like $1000 and then buy a dsm, that way you have an old reliable honda to fall back on, plus you could turbo it and still be pretty reliable. imo

theebluecrx

Personally owning both(ive had the triplets,laser,talon,and 2 eclipses)i say dsm for speed and honda for reliability.Even tho my turbo crx is the fastest car ive had my eclipse auto surprised me.15.3@93 with 10lbs,k&n,fee mods,and a downpipe.