Srt-4
10-25-2004, 07:56 PM
#61
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Re:Srt-4
Originally Posted by random-strike
you are wrong whitey, srt4 would walk all over a hype r on a road course, and a civic si would get laped.
and no im not completly bias for "domestic" cars. if honda made a car that didnt SUCK ***. i would like it.
IMO honda has no car STOCK, that is worth the money. NSX yah right 80k 290hp MY ***. viper baby
hype R? slow FWD 9k revving no torque pos.
civic si, ugly slow ext.
s2k pretty cool except the 9k revving no torque i4. v6 in s2k = THATS A GOOD CAR. i would sing its praises.
A Hype-R would kill an SRT4 around the track and its been proven. And I can't believe you want a V6 in a S2K. The S2K is perfect out of the box. Its handleing is amazing and thats what it was designed for...
http://www.teamgt.it/varano04/360rossi.wmv
That car has hella more power than an S2K but yet the S can still run it down. I love the S and thats the car I'm buying as soon as I have the money
10-25-2004, 07:57 PM
#62
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Re:Srt-4
Originally Posted by random-strike
whitey:
if you bother'd to read the post, those are not car and driver stats, those are FACTS about the cars.
if you bother'd to read the post, those are not car and driver stats, those are FACTS about the cars.
I was just busting your ***** cause you always post them, I wasn't saying they were wrong...
10-25-2004, 07:58 PM
#63
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re:Srt-4
btw i like all sorts of japenese cars, i like corolla gts's, silvias, skylines are ok, i like all sorts of nissians, and 240zs and 300xz's and supras and 300zs and old rx7s.
i dont judge a car by where its built.or wether the manufactors cars in the mid80s were peices of ----. all cars where peices of ---- compared to now. my crx 87 was the biggest peice of ---- ive ever seen.
i dont judge a car by where its built.or wether the manufactors cars in the mid80s were peices of ----. all cars where peices of ---- compared to now. my crx 87 was the biggest peice of ---- ive ever seen.
10-25-2004, 07:59 PM
#64
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Re:Srt-4
How was I proved wrong? 
Wrong about what? It's my opinion and you can't change it with your internet statistics.
Clearly superior to what? Are you going to compare a $20,000 vehicle to a $1000 Civic? You're comparing WHP numbers and 1/4 mile times. Honda doesn't have a turbo charged vehicle you can compare it to in a fair competition. Let's compare the all mighty SRT4 to a Diablo. Is this still fair?
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Wrong about what? It's my opinion and you can't change it with your internet statistics. Clearly superior to what? Are you going to compare a $20,000 vehicle to a $1000 Civic? You're comparing WHP numbers and 1/4 mile times. Honda doesn't have a turbo charged vehicle you can compare it to in a fair competition. Let's compare the all mighty SRT4 to a Diablo. Is this still fair?
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
10-25-2004, 08:02 PM
#65
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re:Srt-4
there is a magazine artical somewhere, i dont rememebr where maybe someone else does, comparing a s2k against a 03 svt cobra and a 03 gt mustang.
the s2k got whipped up on by both mustangs, the s2k can turn corners better than the GT, and the svt and s2k are pretty similar, but if there is a hint of a straight line on the track, the mustangs pull away like no tomarrow.
also in slow corners, the s2k has to either bog through 5k of rpms to get to its powerband, or shift into 1st, and still possibly bog. both the stangs pulled away then.
this was the s2k that revved to 9k, not the newer one that revs a lil less but makes more torque, it would probably fair better than the 9k revving one. honda made it rev less and make more torque specifically for that reason, it bogs out of slow corners.
the s2k got whipped up on by both mustangs, the s2k can turn corners better than the GT, and the svt and s2k are pretty similar, but if there is a hint of a straight line on the track, the mustangs pull away like no tomarrow.
also in slow corners, the s2k has to either bog through 5k of rpms to get to its powerband, or shift into 1st, and still possibly bog. both the stangs pulled away then.
this was the s2k that revved to 9k, not the newer one that revs a lil less but makes more torque, it would probably fair better than the 9k revving one. honda made it rev less and make more torque specifically for that reason, it bogs out of slow corners.
10-25-2004, 08:03 PM
#66
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re:Srt-4
Originally Posted by Dr.Boost
How was I proved wrong? Wrong about what? It's my opinion and you can't change it with your internet statistics.
Clearly superior to what? Are you going to compare a $20,000 vehicle to a $1000 Civic? You're comparing WHP numbers and 1/4 mile times. Honda doesn't have a turbo charged vehicle you can compare it to in a fair competition. Let's compare the all mighty SRT4 to a Diablo. Is this still fair?
Wrong about what? It's my opinion and you can't change it with your internet statistics. Clearly superior to what? Are you going to compare a $20,000 vehicle to a $1000 Civic? You're comparing WHP numbers and 1/4 mile times. Honda doesn't have a turbo charged vehicle you can compare it to in a fair competition. Let's compare the all mighty SRT4 to a Diablo. Is this still fair?
10-25-2004, 08:05 PM
#67
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Re:Srt-4
Originally Posted by random-strike
you said civics, accords ext hondas where better.
Try again.__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
10-25-2004, 08:08 PM
#68
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re:Srt-4
btw that vid is pretty cool, im not sure if that s2k is stock, it doesnt sound like it, and even on those mini-straights the ferraris didnt pull as much as i figured.
but that track is perfect for a s2k, all medium corners, no long straight
but that track is perfect for a s2k, all medium corners, no long straight
10-25-2004, 08:10 PM
#69
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re:Srt-4
Originally Posted by Dr.Boost
It's still a neon. How reliable is that pile of ----? Is it going to fall apart at 40,000 miles like the rest of the neons? The neon can't even come close to Honda as far as reliability goes. How many neons have you seen with 200,000+ miles and still running like a champ?
10-25-2004, 08:11 PM
#70
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Re:Srt-4
Originally Posted by random-strike
Originally Posted by Dr.Boost
It's still a neon. How reliable is that pile of ----? Is it going to fall apart at 40,000 miles like the rest of the neons? The neon can't even come close to Honda as far as reliability goes. How many neons have you seen with 200,000+ miles and still running like a champ?
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
